Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: How Hillary Ruined Her Legacy As Secretary of State [View all]magical thyme
(14,881 posts)46. "The cash donations Hillary simply has no answer for " (salon magazine)
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/31/the_cash_donations_hillary_simply_has_no_answer_for_partner/
The Clinton Foundation's business relationship with 20 foreign governments raises real questions about her judgment
While Clinton was secretary of state, her department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors. That figure from Clintons three full fiscal years in office is almost double the value of arms sales to those countries during the same period of President George W. Bushs second term.
The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that gave to the Clinton Foundation. That was a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period.
American military contractors and their affiliates that donated to the Clinton Foundation and in some cases, helped finance speaking fees to Bill Clinton also got in on the action. Those firms and their subsidiaries were listed as contractors in $163 billion worth of arms deals authorized by the Clinton State Department.
That year, the Algerian government donated $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation and the next year Clintons State Department approved a one-year 70 percent increase in military export authorizations to the country. The jump included authorizations for almost 50,000 items classified as toxicological agents, including chemical agents, biological agents and associated equipment. The State Department had not authorized the export of any of such items to Algeria the year before.
The Clinton Foundation's business relationship with 20 foreign governments raises real questions about her judgment
While Clinton was secretary of state, her department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors. That figure from Clintons three full fiscal years in office is almost double the value of arms sales to those countries during the same period of President George W. Bushs second term.
The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that gave to the Clinton Foundation. That was a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period.
American military contractors and their affiliates that donated to the Clinton Foundation and in some cases, helped finance speaking fees to Bill Clinton also got in on the action. Those firms and their subsidiaries were listed as contractors in $163 billion worth of arms deals authorized by the Clinton State Department.
That year, the Algerian government donated $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation and the next year Clintons State Department approved a one-year 70 percent increase in military export authorizations to the country. The jump included authorizations for almost 50,000 items classified as toxicological agents, including chemical agents, biological agents and associated equipment. The State Department had not authorized the export of any of such items to Algeria the year before.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Under Clinton, the State Department approved $165 billion in commercial arms sales to 20 nations.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#2
Yeah, but I'm continually told: "Where's the smoking gun? All you ever got with Hillary is her appearance of impropriety"...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#53
I don't think she would survive an interview or a debate with a competent questioner.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#55
I hear ya NYC. Unfortunately, because of Hillary's enablers, I think we're gonna be stuck with her as our nominee, unless Bernie or MOM gets a serious cash infusion...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#61
There may be no 'smoking gun' in the sense of absolute proof of illegality, but . . .
markpkessinger
Jun 2015
#68
Of course it raises questions; that's why Hillary is wise to avoid answerin those questions - u gotta give her credit for that at least.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#73
Question: Did Hillary Clinton personally benefit from these various arms sales???
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#57
Yes, I think she benefited. Will that hurt her legacy? I doubt it. Sadly, USA makes its
NCjack
Jun 2015
#64
That IBT article has been posted several times.. IBT is owned by religious nutcases
OKNancy
Jun 2015
#5
I am sorry I could not seem to find a "Moon" type link at Wiki, I am probably wrong, Usually am.
LiberalArkie
Jun 2015
#14
One of The Family top dogs David Coe quotes that always gives me shudders....
peacebird
Jun 2015
#52
When you attack the source, it's usually because there's no way counter the TRUTH.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#54
they COULD be checked... or Sirota could be misquoting and misleading as he's often done
wyldwolf
Jun 2015
#22
How about the US State dept. & The Clinton Foundation Donor list are they misleading liars too
raindaddy
Jun 2015
#38
'Progressives' still looking for their smoking gun, using any source towards that goal
wyldwolf
Jun 2015
#10
We've got to be careful about hating on the RWers. They may end up voting for Bernie
libdem4life
Jun 2015
#62
Trashing the source- What the old school campaigners seem to miss.... is this is a new era.
Jesus Malverde
Jun 2015
#76