Video & Multimedia

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)

55. I don't think she would survive an interview or a debate with a competent questioner.

Wed Jun 3, 2015, 09:51 AM

Jun 2015

Her campaign is, like none before it, totally dependent upon controlling the message and the interactions.

She hasn't stepped foot near a microphone where she might be asked about these specifics.

I know what you're saying though about her defenders and their "where's the smoking gun?"

Well, we just provided all the smoke and all the guns you could ever expect to see and we still get that reply.

.... http://www.vox.com/2015/4/28/8501643/Clinton-foundation-donors-State

.... http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/04/28/clinton-sinking-as-vox-yes-vox-continues-barrage-against-charity/

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

84 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Hillary Ruined Her Legacy As Secretary of State [View all] GoLeft TV Jun 2015 OP

But we are told this is unimportant. zeemike Jun 2015 #1

Under Clinton, the State Department approved $165 billion in commercial arms sales to 20 nations. NYC_SKP Jun 2015 #2

"The cash donations Hillary simply has no answer for " (salon magazine) magical thyme Jun 2015 #46

Yeah, but I'm continually told: "Where's the smoking gun? All you ever got with Hillary is her appearance of impropriety"... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2015 #53

I don't think she would survive an interview or a debate with a competent questioner. NYC_SKP Jun 2015 #55

I hear ya NYC. Unfortunately, because of Hillary's enablers, I think we're gonna be stuck with her as our nominee, unless Bernie or MOM gets a serious cash infusion... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2015 #61

There may be no 'smoking gun' in the sense of absolute proof of illegality, but . . . markpkessinger Jun 2015 #68

Of course it raises questions; that's why Hillary is wise to avoid answerin those questions - u gotta give her credit for that at least. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2015 #73

GOPers see the sales as a positive Increases corporate dividends. nt NCjack Jun 2015 #3

Question: Did Hillary Clinton personally benefit from these various arms sales??? NYC_SKP Jun 2015 #57

Yes, I think she benefited. Will that hurt her legacy? I doubt it. Sadly, USA makes its NCjack Jun 2015 #64

GOPers see the sales as a positive. Increases corporate dividends. nt NCjack Jun 2015 #4

That IBT article has been posted several times.. IBT is owned by religious nutcases OKNancy Jun 2015 #5

Here we go again then Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 #12

Ring of Fire Radio cited that source. alp227 Jun 2015 #25

Okay so Ring of Fire quoted the right wing source Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 #27

I am sorry I could not seem to find a "Moon" type link at Wiki, I am probably wrong, Usually am. LiberalArkie Jun 2015 #14

You didn't bother to read the link I posted OKNancy Jun 2015 #18

And the MSM media has no conflict of interests? Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #75

Isn't the issue whether the story is true or false? merrily Jun 2015 #77

Exactly. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #78

Religious nutcases, eh? You mean like "The Fellowship"? RufusTFirefly Jun 2015 #33

The Family. The Fellowship. hmm. marym625 Jun 2015 #39

One of The Family top dogs David Coe quotes that always gives me shudders.... peacebird Jun 2015 #52

When you attack the source, it's usually because there's no way counter the TRUTH. NYC_SKP Jun 2015 #54

Wow. Great source 4now Jun 2015 #6

David Sirota is a reliable source... raindaddy Jun 2015 #13

since when? wyldwolf Jun 2015 #17

There's some facts included in the article that could be easliy checked? raindaddy Jun 2015 #19

they COULD be checked... or Sirota could be misquoting and misleading as he's often done wyldwolf Jun 2015 #22

How about the US State dept. & The Clinton Foundation Donor list are they misleading liars too raindaddy Jun 2015 #38

This has nothing to do with Bernie, Sex novels, etc. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #47

You're avoiding the question.... raindaddy Jun 2015 #58

You've not asked a question, but I'll play. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #59

How do you spin facts such a this in any other light? raindaddy Jun 2015 #60

Raindaddy DID ask a question in post #38 markpkessinger Jun 2015 #72

Boom! RufusTFirefly Jun 2015 #20

yes wyldwolf Jun 2015 #23

No need for a messenger here Joe Turner Jun 2015 #30

list the smoking guns wyldwolf Jun 2015 #32

It's all over the internet but you want a list. Below link for starters Joe Turner Jun 2015 #34

"all over the internet" is not a smoking gun. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #48

Care to cite some specific examples? n/t markpkessinger Jun 2015 #65

Sure wyldwolf Jun 2015 #69

You may have a point on Nos. 2 and 3 . . . markpkessinger Jun 2015 #71

The only reliable sources are polls from 2013 and anti-Left DU'ers Scootaloo Jun 2015 #26

anti left DUers? marym625 Jun 2015 #40

Or Correct the Record! TM99 Jun 2015 #43

Or a video of Hillary. merrily Jun 2015 #80

Wow. Love and trust zentrum Jun 2015 #28

Reminds me... Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #74

Don't worry. Where there's smoke there is no fire. L0oniX Jun 2015 #7

so far that's been the case. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #8

certainly isn't how I want anyone in public office acting marym625 Jun 2015 #41

Thank you! markpkessinger Jun 2015 #67

It certainly is marym625 Jun 2015 #83

Link to the article swilton Jun 2015 #9

'Progressives' still looking for their smoking gun, using any source towards that goal wyldwolf Jun 2015 #10

This is something I would expect from Dick Cheney... raindaddy Jun 2015 #11

Excellent! Thespian2 Jun 2015 #16

Wish I could double rec this. Paka Jun 2015 #15

Hey, the poor woman was stuck working at Walmart for years. Fuddnik Jun 2015 #21

True. Enthusiast Jun 2015 #31

Even the Governor wouldn't help her. merrily Jun 2015 #79

rwnj? stonecutter357 Jun 2015 #24

Been a Democrat zentrum Jun 2015 #29

+1000 - That's pretty much HRC in a nutshell. Divernan Jun 2015 #45

When push comes to shove... SoapBox Jun 2015 #35

It's true. zentrum Jun 2015 #50

Lies! All Lies!!! Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #36

No he is not! marym625 Jun 2015 #42

So, after all is said and done, all HRC was Unknown Beatle Jun 2015 #37

Yes, nothing new here, SOSs have for years been promoting trade and commerce. NYC_SKP Jun 2015 #56

GOP isn't going to touch this with a 10 foot pole IkeRepublican Jun 2015 #44

So, in other words . . . markpkessinger Jun 2015 #66

What I'm saying is... IkeRepublican Jun 2015 #84

K&R Scuba Jun 2015 #49

Wow.... /nt think Jun 2015 #51

We've got to be careful about hating on the RWers. They may end up voting for Bernie libdem4life Jun 2015 #62

From the couple who brought you the Mark Rich pardon Adenoid_Hynkel Jun 2015 #63

You can't prove a direct quid pro quo there, either. merrily Jun 2015 #81

I am thankfull silenttigersong Jun 2015 #70

Trashing the source- What the old school campaigners seem to miss.... is this is a new era. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #76

Looks like the responsibilities of a SOS can be looked upon as yes Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #82