Video & Multimedia

merrily

(45,251 posts)

81. You can't prove a direct quid pro quo there, either.

Reply to Adenoid_Hynkel (Reply #63)

Thu Jun 4, 2015, 05:32 AM

Jun 2015

Or in using the Lincoln bedroom like a Red Roof Inn for donors.

All just mere RW speculation and insinuation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

84 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Hillary Ruined Her Legacy As Secretary of State [View all] GoLeft TV Jun 2015 OP

But we are told this is unimportant. zeemike Jun 2015 #1

Under Clinton, the State Department approved $165 billion in commercial arms sales to 20 nations. NYC_SKP Jun 2015 #2

"The cash donations Hillary simply has no answer for " (salon magazine) magical thyme Jun 2015 #46

Yeah, but I'm continually told: "Where's the smoking gun? All you ever got with Hillary is her appearance of impropriety"... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2015 #53

I don't think she would survive an interview or a debate with a competent questioner. NYC_SKP Jun 2015 #55

I hear ya NYC. Unfortunately, because of Hillary's enablers, I think we're gonna be stuck with her as our nominee, unless Bernie or MOM gets a serious cash infusion... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2015 #61

There may be no 'smoking gun' in the sense of absolute proof of illegality, but . . . markpkessinger Jun 2015 #68

Of course it raises questions; that's why Hillary is wise to avoid answerin those questions - u gotta give her credit for that at least. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2015 #73

GOPers see the sales as a positive Increases corporate dividends. nt NCjack Jun 2015 #3

Question: Did Hillary Clinton personally benefit from these various arms sales??? NYC_SKP Jun 2015 #57

Yes, I think she benefited. Will that hurt her legacy? I doubt it. Sadly, USA makes its NCjack Jun 2015 #64

GOPers see the sales as a positive. Increases corporate dividends. nt NCjack Jun 2015 #4

That IBT article has been posted several times.. IBT is owned by religious nutcases OKNancy Jun 2015 #5

Here we go again then Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 #12

Ring of Fire Radio cited that source. alp227 Jun 2015 #25

Okay so Ring of Fire quoted the right wing source Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 #27

I am sorry I could not seem to find a "Moon" type link at Wiki, I am probably wrong, Usually am. LiberalArkie Jun 2015 #14

You didn't bother to read the link I posted OKNancy Jun 2015 #18

And the MSM media has no conflict of interests? Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #75

Isn't the issue whether the story is true or false? merrily Jun 2015 #77

Exactly. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #78

Religious nutcases, eh? You mean like "The Fellowship"? RufusTFirefly Jun 2015 #33

The Family. The Fellowship. hmm. marym625 Jun 2015 #39

One of The Family top dogs David Coe quotes that always gives me shudders.... peacebird Jun 2015 #52

When you attack the source, it's usually because there's no way counter the TRUTH. NYC_SKP Jun 2015 #54

Wow. Great source 4now Jun 2015 #6

David Sirota is a reliable source... raindaddy Jun 2015 #13

since when? wyldwolf Jun 2015 #17

There's some facts included in the article that could be easliy checked? raindaddy Jun 2015 #19

they COULD be checked... or Sirota could be misquoting and misleading as he's often done wyldwolf Jun 2015 #22

How about the US State dept. & The Clinton Foundation Donor list are they misleading liars too raindaddy Jun 2015 #38

This has nothing to do with Bernie, Sex novels, etc. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #47

You're avoiding the question.... raindaddy Jun 2015 #58

You've not asked a question, but I'll play. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #59

How do you spin facts such a this in any other light? raindaddy Jun 2015 #60

Raindaddy DID ask a question in post #38 markpkessinger Jun 2015 #72

Boom! RufusTFirefly Jun 2015 #20

yes wyldwolf Jun 2015 #23

No need for a messenger here Joe Turner Jun 2015 #30

list the smoking guns wyldwolf Jun 2015 #32

It's all over the internet but you want a list. Below link for starters Joe Turner Jun 2015 #34

"all over the internet" is not a smoking gun. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #48

Care to cite some specific examples? n/t markpkessinger Jun 2015 #65

Sure wyldwolf Jun 2015 #69

You may have a point on Nos. 2 and 3 . . . markpkessinger Jun 2015 #71

The only reliable sources are polls from 2013 and anti-Left DU'ers Scootaloo Jun 2015 #26

anti left DUers? marym625 Jun 2015 #40

Or Correct the Record! TM99 Jun 2015 #43

Or a video of Hillary. merrily Jun 2015 #80

Wow. Love and trust zentrum Jun 2015 #28

Reminds me... Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #74

Don't worry. Where there's smoke there is no fire. L0oniX Jun 2015 #7

so far that's been the case. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #8

certainly isn't how I want anyone in public office acting marym625 Jun 2015 #41

Thank you! markpkessinger Jun 2015 #67

It certainly is marym625 Jun 2015 #83

Link to the article swilton Jun 2015 #9

'Progressives' still looking for their smoking gun, using any source towards that goal wyldwolf Jun 2015 #10

This is something I would expect from Dick Cheney... raindaddy Jun 2015 #11

Excellent! Thespian2 Jun 2015 #16

Wish I could double rec this. Paka Jun 2015 #15

Hey, the poor woman was stuck working at Walmart for years. Fuddnik Jun 2015 #21

True. Enthusiast Jun 2015 #31

Even the Governor wouldn't help her. merrily Jun 2015 #79

rwnj? stonecutter357 Jun 2015 #24

Been a Democrat zentrum Jun 2015 #29

+1000 - That's pretty much HRC in a nutshell. Divernan Jun 2015 #45

When push comes to shove... SoapBox Jun 2015 #35

It's true. zentrum Jun 2015 #50

Lies! All Lies!!! Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #36

No he is not! marym625 Jun 2015 #42

So, after all is said and done, all HRC was Unknown Beatle Jun 2015 #37

Yes, nothing new here, SOSs have for years been promoting trade and commerce. NYC_SKP Jun 2015 #56

GOP isn't going to touch this with a 10 foot pole IkeRepublican Jun 2015 #44

So, in other words . . . markpkessinger Jun 2015 #66

What I'm saying is... IkeRepublican Jun 2015 #84

K&R Scuba Jun 2015 #49

Wow.... /nt think Jun 2015 #51

We've got to be careful about hating on the RWers. They may end up voting for Bernie libdem4life Jun 2015 #62

From the couple who brought you the Mark Rich pardon Adenoid_Hynkel Jun 2015 #63

You can't prove a direct quid pro quo there, either. merrily Jun 2015 #81

I am thankfull silenttigersong Jun 2015 #70

Trashing the source- What the old school campaigners seem to miss.... is this is a new era. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #76

Looks like the responsibilities of a SOS can be looked upon as yes Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #82