Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)

5. as long as fux sticks to that message

Reply to baldguy (Reply #4)

Sat May 12, 2012, 11:27 AM

May 2012

and panders to that narrow viewpoint, then yeah.

But if you put this in its proper context--about the majority being able to strip basic human rights from those they do not like--then you will see exactly what you see in this video clip.

When children and unmarried couples who are living together begin being negatively impacted by this mess, then is when there will be talk of a repeal of it. Frankly, it should be unconstitutional for a state to strip federally guaranteed rights from anyone in that state.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clergy Rebukes Media for Asking Wrong Questions About Amendment One [View all] stlsaxman May 2012 OP

That was great! 20score May 2012 #1

that was nice. iemitsu May 2012 #2

heard an interesting point about the Amendment One vote- stlsaxman May 2012 #3

Gee whiz, there are a lot of blacks on that video agreeing with the good Reverend. baldguy May 2012 #4

as long as fux sticks to that message SemperEadem May 2012 #5