Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Ed Speaks [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)65. You're welcome. I am ashamed to say that I wasn't even aware of her 2004 Senate floor speech.
That was about the time of the first equal marriage law in the United States, that of Massachusetts. (Vermont was the first to enact civil union.)
November 18, 2003: The Massachusetts Supreme Court rules in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, a case brought by Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, that the state constitution mandates the freedom to marry for same-sex couples. Three months later, the Court reaffirms its decision, stating that only marriage - not separate and lesser mechanisms, such as civil union - sufficiently protects same-sex couples and their families.
May 17, 2004: Massachusetts becomes the first state in the United States to allow same-sex couples to share in the freedom to marry. Marriage opponents attempt to amend the constitution to strip away the freedom to marry, but the amendment is defeated on June 14, 2007, when over 75 percent of the state legislature votes to stand up for all families.
The Mass. Supreme Judicial Court had given the legislature a limited period of time after the Goodridge decision to act. The Legislature wanted to go civil union, but BOTH right wingers and LGBT rights activists opposed it, which took massive courage on the part of the latter, so the legislature dropped it and did nothing. The decision in Goodridge then became final, giving Massachusetts the distinction of being the first state in the nation to recognize equal marriage.
As a result of your information, I have amended this thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12777603
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Amen. As to controlling our information - I read that new leak about the TPP today and one of the
jwirr
Jul 2015
#32
Include FSTV (Free Speech TV) online or via Dish and Direct with 'Democracy Now!",
appalachiablue
Jul 2015
#7
Some Bernie Party Refreshments for DU supporters! Forgot to mention, some watch TH & others
appalachiablue
Jul 2015
#25
To add, you saw my comment about a ROKU Box. We usually watch Thom's programs, Amy G.'s
appalachiablue
Jul 2015
#39
MSNBC was never a liberal voice. It was a Republican voice when Bush was in office. It began
merrily
Aug 2015
#51
Great idea. Or, Pres. Sanders can make ED SCHULTZ Communications Director! 'Media CZAR'!
appalachiablue
Jul 2015
#41
MSNBC's ratings are in the Toilet because they made Chris Hayes a "major personality"
zebonaut
Jul 2015
#16
Overall, MSNBC stinks. They cover the same stories in almost the same way from the start of the
merrily
Aug 2015
#54
IMO Ed is being removed because people don't want to listen to smart people because...
L0oniX
Aug 2015
#82
Thanks ED! For all you do & we'll be following you. You're The Best! Have some Bernie Party Cake!
appalachiablue
Jul 2015
#24
Didn't Hillary vote for the IWR, the Defense of Marriage Act, and to criminalize flag-burning?
RufusTFirefly
Jul 2015
#27
What does Hillary Clinton (OR my avatar) have to do with Ed Schultz and his cancellation?
George II
Jul 2015
#30
She has a lot to do with being rightist when it suits her and that has a lot to do with your post
merrily
Aug 2015
#56
She advocated AND voted for the Iraq Invasion, voted for the Patriot Act and sponsored two flag
merrily
Aug 2015
#55
You're welcome. I am ashamed to say that I wasn't even aware of her 2004 Senate floor speech.
merrily
Aug 2015
#65
They have their agenda and their marching orders. I don't have a need to buy into into any of it.
merrily
Aug 2015
#76
It seems it's much easier to ask an insinuating question than actually gather facts and make
rhett o rick
Aug 2015
#78
You've still not mentioned your opinion. I guess you don't like Big Ed. I thought you just
rhett o rick
Aug 2015
#89
Where did you get the idea that I don't like unions? That is patently false and offensive.
George II
Aug 2015
#90
I couldn't tell from your post where you stood on unions. I assumed from your insinuation
rhett o rick
Aug 2015
#91
You couldn't tell from my post but you went ahead and said I don't like unions anyway?
George II
Aug 2015
#92
it's sad but so true,,, Maddow was my opium on a friday night when she first started
juxtaposed
Jul 2015
#43
Attacking Republicans OR Democrats is easy. Telling the truth about all politics is not popular.
merrily
Aug 2015
#57
From the enthusiastic crowds that Bernie has been drawing, it's clear what Americans want and need
merrily
Aug 2015
#58
I wondered how Toad got any high visibility job at all in broadcasting. Read his wiki.
merrily
Aug 2015
#61
Many more qualified than Todd would be more than willing to do the same and more to host MTP.
merrily
Aug 2015
#85
Corporate America tries to kill Liberal MSNBC right before the next election....
zebonaut
Aug 2015
#87
That doesn't mean that they don't have plans to ease him out of one or the other.
merrily
Aug 2015
#60
God bless Ed. He is taking what happened with class and grace. And he is right.
totodeinhere
Aug 2015
#46