Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
17. A level of exploitative greed almost impossible to grasp
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:33 AM
Oct 2015

Last edited Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:12 AM - Edit history (1)

Exploiting human suffering and tragedy to finance their boutique, pardon-the-expression, "charity" and their One Percent life style.

Read the whole link: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/30/us/politics/an-award-for-bill-clinton-came-with-500000-for-his-foundation.html?_r=0
to get a detailed, stomach-turning accounting of how the Clinton Family Foundation blatantly operates as a (totally unnecessary) middle man to skim off money.

“The Clinton Foundation had rejected the Happy Hearts Fund invitation more than once, until there was a thinly veiled solicitation and then the offer of an ($500,000) honorarium.” She booked Cipriani 42nd Street, which greeted guests with Bellini cocktails on silver trays. She flew in Sheryl Crow with her band and crew for a 20-minute set. She special-ordered heart-shaped floral centerpieces, heart-shaped chocolate parfaits, heart-shaped tiramisù and, because orange is the charity’s color, an orange carpet rather than a red one. She imported a Swiss auctioneer and handed out orange rulers to serve as auction paddles, playfully threatening to use hers to spank the highest bidder for an Ibiza vacation. The gala cost $363,413. But the real splurge? Bill Clinton.

The former president of the United States agreed to accept a lifetime achievement award at the June 2014 event after Ms. Nemcova offered a $500,000 contribution to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. The donation, made late last year after the foundation sent the charity an invoice, amounted to almost a quarter of the evening’s net proceeds — enough to build 10 preschools in Indonesia.


Happy Hearts collaborated more expeditiously in Haiti with the Digicel Foundation, whose founder, the Irish billionaire Denis O’Brien, is a multimillion-dollar supporter of the Clinton Foundation and whose parent telecommunications company benefited from grants from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department.

Digicel also made a commitment at the 2011 meeting to build schools; it was a formality, though, as Digicel had already taken the lead in Haiti in that realm. It has built 150 schools there over the past seven years; Happy Hearts has built seven, six of them joint or side-by-side ventures with Digicel.

One of those schools, operated by the Haitian group Prodev, was featured in the Clinton Foundation’s most recent annual report as “built through a Clinton Global Initiative Commitment to Action.” The Clinton Foundation’s sole direct contribution to the school was a grant for an Earth Day celebration and tree-planting activity.

Outside Cipriani, protesters, mostly Haitian-Americans frustrated with the earthquake reconstruction effort, stood behind barricades holding signs. “Clinton, where is the money?” they chanted. “In whose pockets?”

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Notice that he says it as if people are wrong about the rich. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #1
Silly poor people deutsey Oct 2015 #9
is Bill having some voice/speaking issues? At beginning, sounded slurred a bit tomm2thumbs Oct 2015 #2
I noticed some issue with his speech as well. Old Crow Oct 2015 #3
In reality, we've seen the graphics that show Bill is completely wrong there. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #16
He looks great, and the point about Trump is accurate. MADem Oct 2015 #4
The human mind can rationalize just about anything. highprincipleswork Oct 2015 #5
+1 deutsey Oct 2015 #8
Actually, Bill is right. Bill has no need to rationalize anything. He tells it like it is. leftofcool Oct 2015 #11
Yeah, I know, everyone is delusional that the income disparity is what it is highprincipleswork Oct 2015 #33
"People THINK!?!?! the system's rigged against us & the rich get all the gain ?!?!?! " Divernan Oct 2015 #6
What a world class tangled web of quid pro quos the Clintons have woven. Divernan Oct 2015 #7
"rigged against US"? He actually said rigged against US? tularetom Oct 2015 #26
Good catch! Mr. $70 million in 10 years still claiming to be poor? Divernan Oct 2015 #29
Mainstream political parties have become self-serving corporations who serve other corporations whereisjustice Oct 2015 #10
Yea, those poor African villages served by the CGI are so rich and privileged leftofcool Oct 2015 #12
An Award for Bill Clinton Came With $500,000 for His Foundation whereisjustice Oct 2015 #13
A level of exploitative greed almost impossible to grasp Divernan Oct 2015 #17
Sadly,so little money trickles through the Clintons down to deserving poor! Divernan Oct 2015 #18
Exactly what does their foundation claim to be doing for the jwirr Oct 2015 #20
You need a flow chart to follow all the actions & interactions. Divernan Oct 2015 #27
Just exactly what I would expect from a Clinton. All the people jwirr Oct 2015 #28
I'm a Bernie guy but I give Bill some slack. Stevepol Oct 2015 #14
The "mistakes" Bill made; Glass Steagall, NAFTA , Telecommunications Act, etc raindaddy Oct 2015 #22
Not really. There is an almost straight trend line on income inequality going back to the late 1960s stevenleser Oct 2015 #30
Never said he was completely to blame.. raindaddy Oct 2015 #31
He's not to blame at all. These charts prove it. Wages for the 99% did better under Clinton than stevenleser Oct 2015 #32
Your charts prove nada..Because the harm Bill Clinton did didn't occur untill he was out of office.. raindaddy Oct 2015 #34
They do prove it. It is you who has proved nothing. You have provided no backup for your claims at stevenleser Oct 2015 #35
How do your charts asses the future outcome of Clinton's Presidency? raindaddy Oct 2015 #36
I can tell you why without even watching the video. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #15
Sounds more like a Rockefeller Republican than a Democrat.. raindaddy Oct 2015 #19
Not sad for him, he got what he was after from the first time he ran for office tularetom Oct 2015 #24
If this is the great unveiling of the other half of the Clinton brand, I hope we see more of it. raindaddy Oct 2015 #25
I think... quickesst Oct 2015 #21
He looks like hell. Colbert on the other hand. azmom Oct 2015 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Colbert: Bill Clinton Exp...»Reply #17