Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

(14,255 posts)

2. No, and to say so makes a mockery of the feminist movement.

Fri Oct 9, 2015, 03:28 PM

Oct 2015

We wanted equality, not special snowflake status.
ROF is absolutely correct.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does Criticizing Hillary Clinton Mean You�re Anti-Woman? [View all] GoLeft TV Oct 2015 OP

Oh yes they can and will zeemike Oct 2015 #1

Well I am not a female but I would like to see a woman president. zeemike Oct 2015 #10

agreed completely, zeemike. :D roguevalley Oct 2015 #16

No, and to say so makes a mockery of the feminist movement. djean111 Oct 2015 #2

This is an inherently sexist post Android3.14 Oct 2015 #3

True. But it's not like people here haven't been accused of misogyny thesquanderer Oct 2015 #4

You have that right Android3.14 Oct 2015 #5

Any of those combinations would be a game changer for America. zeemike Oct 2015 #11

I like Warren Angry Dragon Oct 2015 #6

ditto criticizing neoliberlalism--after all, Thatcher was a woman! MisterP Oct 2015 #7

K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Oct 2015 #8

Not unless you're a misogynist. pnwmom Oct 2015 #12

No. And Critique Is Necessary: NonMetro Oct 2015 #13

Once on a forum Mendocino Oct 2015 #14

just asking the question restorefreedom Oct 2015 #15