For the undying 9/11 MORONIC JET FUEL ARGUMENT

[jamzrockz]

30. You can always tell a fraud when they

trying to debunk an argument nobody is making. Nobody I have ever heard of thinks you cannot bend (I said bend not collapse steel) structures when heated. The argument is that there was evidence of molten steel in the building and temperatures from a jet fire doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel.

All he did was thoroughly debunk an argument he created in his own mind. I know some people would say that it is just the truthers moving the goal post but please find me evidence of truthers making the argument that you cannot bend steel structures when heated and I will apologize. Speaking of bending, how come the steel structure did not bend like was demonstrated in the experiment? I mean, we should have expected the weaker part of the building to fall to the side but instead we got a collapse. Weird how that happens.

This is why you want to get a man of science not a run of the mill craft man to explain basic physics. Speaking of a man of science, you can check out physicsandreason experiments about 911. Where he actually uses twin towers like models to perform his experiments.

The video below shows alleged evidence of molten steel coming out of the video at 4:00 - 4:20. The website is a good resource for anyone trying to understand what happened that day using science experiments.

The video below talks about the financial dealings connected with the crime of 911. Watch and enjoy

Also even if you believe the official conspiracy theory on the 911 attack, please don't listen to disingenuous people like this.