Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malthaussen

(18,606 posts)
12. Straightforward, standard analyis.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:06 PM
Feb 2016

It will be derided as a pipe-dream because the benefits are so great. If it could be implemented, I imagine we'd see short-term effects in line with what is suggested.

However, I personally am not satisfied that we could sustain a 50s-60s economy of conspicuous waste very far into the future, as it will only increase the environmental impact, and Mother Nature is starting to get annoyed with us. A booming economy would only hasten the day of reckoning. While those who advocate such a return to the Good Old Days would doubtless make noises about reducing environmental impact through recycling and energy alternatives, the mess in the oceans continues to grow and global warming nears the point of no return.

That said, since no candidate is proposing any alternative that takes this into account, the Sanders plan is no worse than any other, and has the virtue of short-term improvement, so at least we go out with a bang, and not a whimper.

-- Mal

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Famous Economist Carefull...»Reply #12