Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

captainarizona

(363 posts)

21. if president Obama had mitch mcconnell arrested for sedition treason and sabotage

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:30 PM

Feb 2016

this would not have happened. Along with the other traitors in congress. The statue of limitations has not run out. We should demand of hillery and bernie that they call for these republicans to be arrested for their crimes!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pic Of The Moment: GOP Says Democrats Must Win Election If They Want New Supreme Court Justice [View all] EarlG Feb 2016 OP

Just wish Obama would appoint someone with a Trial Lawyer background, someone who has represented Dustlawyer Feb 2016 #1

+1 million geardaddy Feb 2016 #9

K & R! SoapBox Feb 2016 #2

Spot on, EarlG! BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #3

The Possible SCOTUS Nominee the GOP FEAR the most: Tino Cuellar BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #4

Thank you very much for the introduction. debunction.junction Feb 2016 #22

LOVE LOVE LOVE the William O. Douglas comparison! SusanaMontana41 Feb 2016 #30

This would seemingly be a very, very astute choice for Obama to make Stargleamer Feb 2016 #37

Hey, Clarence had experience mdbl Feb 2016 #38

Obviously NewJeffCT Feb 2016 #40

Yep. But with Tino, that'll hurt them because he's a naturalized citizen AND Mexican-American, BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #42

like Scalia, they're strict "Originalists"... alterfurz Feb 2016 #5

+100 AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #27

What we don't need is a "consensus" appointee. ladjf Feb 2016 #6

hypocrisy thelasthope Feb 2016 #7

K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #8

Kamala Harris................................... turbinetree Feb 2016 #10

Harris is running for Boxer's (or Feinstein's) seat Arkana Feb 2016 #25

I believe we need a strong progressive woman on this bench......................... turbinetree Feb 2016 #33

I'm confused... gregcrawford Feb 2016 #11

Well said, gregcrawford. 3catwoman3 Feb 2016 #14

You're very kind. Thank you! gregcrawford Feb 2016 #19

How about a big, sloppy kiss? SusanaMontana41 Feb 2016 #31

I'm puckered up and waiting! gregcrawford Feb 2016 #39

If you take Aquinas's word for it... malthaussen Feb 2016 #17

Oooooh! I LIKE that argument! gregcrawford Feb 2016 #18

Well said, but no need for confusion awoke_in_2003 Feb 2016 #43

That is NOT how The Constitution is set up is it? SHRED Feb 2016 #12

We did that, twice! Delmette Feb 2016 #13

We damn sure did. 3catwoman3 Feb 2016 #15

And if a Democrat is elected in 2016, what would be their excuse? malthaussen Feb 2016 #16

We did, 2008, 2012, and we are doing it again in 2016! oldandhappy Feb 2016 #20

if president Obama had mitch mcconnell arrested for sedition treason and sabotage captainarizona Feb 2016 #21

Let them play - we will see who will win Silver_Witch Feb 2016 #23

If the shoe was on the other foot and a Republican was replacing Ginsburg Arkana Feb 2016 #24

Which is why we need more Dems in Congress IronLionZion Feb 2016 #26

Actually, the people spoke twice, as far as I know. nt Stellar Feb 2016 #28

GOP disses memory of "strict constitutionalist" by ignoring Constitution. Beartracks Feb 2016 #29

I believe there is a solution Scalded Nun Feb 2016 #32

Oh Cruz libodem Feb 2016 #34

"GOP Says Democrats Must Win Election If They Want New Supreme Court Justice" Phlem Feb 2016 #35

I know NewJeffCT Feb 2016 #41

Nice one! K&R n/t ffr Feb 2016 #36