Video & Multimedia

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)

7. I guess some are tired of being told to vote for inevitable.

Reply to rtracey (Reply #4)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 05:14 PM

Mar 2016

Perhaps it is what the Democratic party needs: not inevitability but a dose of reality.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Poll: 33% of Sanders Supporters Wouldn't Vote for Clinton in November [View all] Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 OP

I'd like to hear the alternative suggestions. n/t jaysunb Mar 2016 #1

Jill Stein, for one. Maedhros Mar 2016 #9

Absolutely. john978 Mar 2016 #21

I would probably STILL be called a misogynist for choosing her over Hillary. [n/t] Maedhros Mar 2016 #22

You like them young, I take it? Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #31

says a lot about bernie supporters. sort of trump or bust lol nt msongs Mar 2016 #2

That number Andy823 Mar 2016 #8

no tk2kewl Mar 2016 #23

Why the hell haven't I put you on ignore yet? The things you post are so...not worth reading. Maedhros Mar 2016 #10

Shows how star-struck HRC supporters are.. phazed0 Mar 2016 #14

Where those voters live matters. TDale313 Mar 2016 #3

Considering what happened last night, it could be some swing states Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #16

Nice rtracey Mar 2016 #4

Or folks could just vote for Bernie, who will pull ALL of those indies as well as base dems Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #6

I guess some are tired of being told to vote for inevitable. R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2016 #7

+1 No more. nt phazed0 Mar 2016 #15

I remember similar polls that said Clinton voters wouldn't back Obama. iandhr Mar 2016 #5

Gee. That is so 8 years ago. Jakes Progress Mar 2016 #20

A vote for Hillary means President Trump. zebonaut Mar 2016 #11

Wow! 33%... thats huge! She absolutely cannot win the GE with numbers like that against her! Bubzer Mar 2016 #12

Surprised the number is that low! InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2016 #13

I take it you are willing to risk a GOP White House, Senate and House. If I am wrong Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #27

huh?! just stating an opinion after the disgusting way Hillary and her supporters have conducted themselves. But, not suggesting anything regarding my own intentions... InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2016 #37

Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #18

Let's try to guess. Jakes Progress Mar 2016 #17

Fed up? No confidence in the system? Aren't being represented by either party? Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #19

So I'm fed up. I'm despondent. Jakes Progress Mar 2016 #24

I'll vote for the candidate whose views most align with mine. TheUndecider Mar 2016 #33

Independents and swing voters who are anti-establishment starroute Mar 2016 #28

Then they need to also work in the grass roots to get local, state and congressional candidates Fla Dem Mar 2016 #32

I'm laughing at the 'superior' intellect. Maedhros Mar 2016 #25

whatever % plus 1 ish of the hammer Mar 2016 #26

How many Clinton supporters won't vote for Sanders? nt valerief Mar 2016 #29

My guess is that the question Rahm Emanuel posed has finally sunk in, and this is their answer. GoneFishin Mar 2016 #30

So, it's down to bluff poker TalkingDog Mar 2016 #34

Just got my letter from my union Generic Other Mar 2016 #36

Looks to me like Bernie's idea about "getting involved and staying involved" is a HUGE fail world wide wally Mar 2016 #35

There is some context that is necessary PDittie Mar 2016 #38

"There's not a dime's worth of difference between Al Gore and George Bush" greenman3610 Mar 2016 #39

Aren't you sick of polls yet? I support Bernie and I think that 30% figure is BOOOOO-gus. marble falls Mar 2016 #40

If true, say hello to President Trump Sinan Mar 2016 #41

I will only vote TRUE blue fun n serious Mar 2016 #42

well she could pull out the Mitt Romney fuckup PatrynXX Mar 2016 #43

That's okay, 33% of Clinton supporters might not live until election day. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2016 #44