Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Democracy Now! (April 4): How Much Has Hillary Clinton's Campaign Taken from Fossil Fuel Companies? [View all]Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)47. I want my three Pinocchios, please
From Greenpeace.org
Last updated Sunday, April 3
Hillary Clintons Connections to the Oil and Gas Industry
By Jesse Coleman
Hillary Clintons campaign has been backed by the fossil fuel industry in a number of ways.
First, there are the direct contributions from people working for fossil fuel companies to Clintons campaign committee. According to the most recent filings, the committee has received $309,107 (as of March 21, 2016; source: Center for Responsive Politics) from such donors.
Next are the fossil fuel lobbyists, many of whom have also bundled contributions. These donations also flow to Clintons campaign committee. Greenpeace has tracked $1,465,610 in bundled and direct donations from lobbyists currently registered as lobbying for the fossil fuel industry.
Last are contributions from fossil fuel interests to Super PACs supporting Hillary Clinton. Greenpeace has found $3,250,000 in donations from large donors connected to the fossil fuel industry to Priorities Action USA, a Super PAC supporting Secretary Clintons campaign.
read more at the link
Fossil Fuel Funding of 2016 Presidential Candidates
How much money have the presidential candidates taken from the fossil fuel industry?
By Jesse Coleman
These data were provided by the Center for Responsive Politics, based on filings made available on January 31, 2016.
These totals do not include funding from the fossil fuel industry to groups that support individual candidates but are outside of the campaign committees.
Because of lax regulation of political donations due in part to the Supreme Courts decision in Citizens United v. FEC it is impossible to track all of the support provided to candidates from the oil and gas and coal industries. Private foundations like Hillary Clintons Clinton Foundation and SuperPACS like Jeb Bushs Right to Rise PAC have received millions of dollars from fossil fuel sources, but are not included in this list.
For more on what can be done to bring transparency and accountability to the political system and reduce the corrosive influence of money in politics, visit here.
Get more grusome details at the link.
Fossil Fuel Lobbyists Contributions to the Clinton Campaign
Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Super PAC supporting her have received $138,400 from fossil fuel lobbyists and $1,327,210 from bundlers.
By Charlie Cray
Last updated: April 4, 2016
All told, the campaign to elect Hillary Clinton for president in 2016 has received more than $4.5 million from lobbyists, bundlers, and large donors connected the fossil fuel industry.
But who exactly are these lobbyists and bundlers, and who do they represent? Some of them work in-house for some of the biggest names in the fossil fuel industry (think ExxonMobil and Chevron to name a few). Others are hired hands.
Read more at the link
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Democracy Now! (April 4): How Much Has Hillary Clinton's Campaign Taken from Fossil Fuel Companies? [View all]
Jack Rabbit
Apr 2016
OP
Sanders people just got caught lying: Sanders has taken money from the fossil fuel people"
lewebley3
Apr 2016
#2
Just the truth: Sanders donor list's of people in the fossil fuel industry: $53,000
lewebley3
Apr 2016
#9
No, just a fact: Greenpeace is a Sanders supporter 1st and a truth teller second
lewebley3
Apr 2016
#29
Not sure of your point. If you are trying to rationalize that H. Clinton isn't influenced by
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#12
I don't know about other professions, but when lawyers examine their client lists and obligations,
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#24
The problem with this statement, "she should take the pledge not to take any more of that kind of
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#54
That is not Hillary legacy's: you are just typing Sanders paid for propaganda
lewebley3
Apr 2016
#50
Hillary's legacy is that when we needed her the most, she turned her back on us and
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#53
Keep in mind that her supporters identify primarily as "Democrat" and NOT as "Liberal."
Maedhros
Apr 2016
#20
Wow, she said that young people were too stupid to understand anything "adult".. LOL.
glowing
Apr 2016
#5
Like a typical authoritarian she picks advisors that will tell her what she wants to hear.
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#8
Something about Eva Resnick-Day reminds me of another Eva that posted here a long while back
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#10
I can easily see her as being on the front lines there, I bet she spoke her mind well before the
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#15
It is sad that not only the Clinton campaign but those who support her choose to distort the facts..
highprincipleswork
Apr 2016
#17