Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Now I Know Why The SOS Hillary Doesn't want Her Transcripts Released - Case in Point [View all]INdemo
(7,024 posts)23. If she didnt have anything to hide,Hillary would release them.
Given Hillary's history I would expect her speech to Goldman Sachs probably sounded more like a Quarterly Report than a speech.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Now I Know Why The SOS Hillary Doesn't want Her Transcripts Released - Case in Point [View all]
tomm2thumbs
Apr 2016
OP
bingo - especially a former supporter of Goldwater, who was against the Civil Rights Act
tomm2thumbs
Apr 2016
#18
How many of those politicians speak to Wall Street firms at $250,000 to $300,000 per speech.
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#36
TRADE is critical to our economy. How many jobs would we lose here without exports?
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#4
It worked real well for 200 years until Reagan started gutting trade protections then NAFTA under
FighttheFuture
Apr 2016
#35
Transcripts of paid speeches have never been released by any male candidate, but tax returns
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#16
There is a specific issue in this campaign that she is influenced by all of the Wall Street money
Dustlawyer
Apr 2016
#20
There is such a CLAIM, backed up by no evidence. What pro-bank position has she taken
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#21
She supporter and helped push Bill's deregulation and her policies towards Wall Street reform
Dustlawyer
Apr 2016
#69
She gave speech after speech in support, she didn't have to do that, no one forced her to.
Dustlawyer
Apr 2016
#71
Wrong. It's a special requirment for these times, where people are wakling up to the bullshit
FighttheFuture
Apr 2016
#41
Except no one's demanding it from the Rethugs. It's only required of the woman in the race.
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#43
That is such bullshit. You keep trying to spin this as a sexual issue. It is not.
BillZBubb
Apr 2016
#52
BULL. It's NOT because she's a woman. It becaus she's a Demcorat, a CLINTON and she's aligning
FighttheFuture
Apr 2016
#72
My guess is Republicans have audio copies and will release during the general if it gets that far
tomm2thumbs
Apr 2016
#15
Release the Transcripts! Free them from their electronic bondage! nt
Land of Enchantment
Apr 2016
#28
Thanks but I did not do this one...artist unknown...I thought it exquisite.
Land of Enchantment
Apr 2016
#48
What's the big fuss??? I got an exclusive peek at the transcripts from Anonymus and they
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#33
They don't need to be released. You know what they said - let's collude together.
highprincipleswork
Apr 2016
#56
Sure. She stood in front of hundreds, including Democrats and some detractors, and said let's carve
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#57
Why? Youll take everything out of context, say it's been changed, say she went off
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#61
You're working way too hard to explain the actions and inactions of your candidate.
highprincipleswork
Apr 2016
#68
Sydney Blumenthal and John Podesta - friends of the Clintons and named parties
ish of the hammer
Apr 2016
#64