Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
47. K&R
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 05:29 PM
Apr 2016

Especially about the damage done by Clinton's Telecommunications Bill. Six corporate conglomerates own the media and decide what is 'news' and most importantly, what or who is promoted. Reality TV (Roman bread and circuses) has replaced history, arts, and anything illuminating, enlightening and educational.

I started realizing this so clearly during the 2000 election when the media appeared universally against Gore. Then came the push to war AGAINST Iraq and it was all so shockingly clear. All the voices opposed to war were marginalized and silenced while the hawkish war promoters like Cheney, Condiliar, Rummy got free rein, and the news reader bloviators like Chucky, Timmy Russert (may he rest in H---), et. al. never questioned or challenged such pre-emptive action against an innocent nation totally unconnected to 9/11, despite such clear facts as:

Reason 1: Iraq did not attack the US; fifteen of the nineteen hijackers were Saudi Arabian while the other four were from the UAE, Egypt, Yemen. They learned to fly here in the States (Florida, Arizona). Bin Laden was also Saudi!

Reason 2: Iraq had been under horrific UN sanctions since the first Bush war on Iraq in 1991; so how could it have morphed into an imminent threat to the US in 2002 when IWR was being peddled

Reason 3: W's administration introduced IWR and demanded a vote on it right before the 2002 midterm elections. Why... because PNAC/the Bush cabal and Carlyle group had their eyes on carving up Iraq's oil fields.

Reason 4: the Bush cabal STOLE the White House in 2000 because of those PNAC plans. Then, they ignored all the warnings/chatter leading up to 9/11 including the August 6th PDB. They alleged they were blindsided and could not have foreseen such an attack. But that flew in the face of the fact that the airspace had to be closed around the G-8 summit in Genoa, Italy in July 2001 precisely because of terrorists' threats to fly planes into buildings!

Reason 5: Anyone who knew history, knew that Reagan sold WMDs to Saddam/Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war (recall the photo of Rumsfeld shaking Saddam's hand). So when Cheney took to the airwaves in 2002 talking about WMDs and said he knew where they were and how they'd been used against the Kurds, he was telling the truth... about 1988. He was using his dirty past to foment a new war for oil

Reason 6: the Bush cabal withdrew the weapons inspectors because they were not finding anything. Scott Ritter (who was smeared) and his fellow inspectors' findings would not/did not conform to the desired Bush narrative, so Colin Bowel sold his soul and did his 'tube' presentation to the UN





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Both of them montanacowboy Apr 2016 #1
Was gonna say the same thing. elleng Apr 2016 #5
They did, and I don't like the current third way. Duval Apr 2016 #11
+1 glinda Apr 2016 #19
+2 turbinetree Apr 2016 #39
+1 zentrum Apr 2016 #18
The Democratic Party is so close to nominating a woman who supported Goldwater. LS_Editor Apr 2016 #2
Oh my TimeToGo Apr 2016 #24
Well, it's incomplete, however, an R&K nevertheless. longship Apr 2016 #3
and what's so sickening is that we might have 8 more years of this guy creeping around virgista Apr 2016 #4
+1 but here's hoping that won't happen! snagglepuss Apr 2016 #6
yep,if HRC gets in elmac Apr 2016 #14
the whole thing is sooo House of Cards virgista Apr 2016 #46
He Sure Got The Ball Rolling Rightward colsohlibgal Apr 2016 #7
Right, 'for some reason.' elleng Apr 2016 #10
I hated Clinton more than any Democrat I'd ever voted for. ancianita Apr 2016 #8
She is the first Dem running that I have ever not liked at all. glinda Apr 2016 #21
I meant Bill Clinton. Hillary has an important speech she will owe Berners. She has more ancianita Apr 2016 #30
I think she agrees with Bill: " What are these people going to do? They got nowhere else to go..." ancianita Apr 2016 #32
K & R. Glad you posted, I was going to also. In one lecture, talk, maybe with Thom H. appalachiablue Apr 2016 #9
K & R! Listen liberals! TIME TO PANIC Apr 2016 #12
Thanks for posting. I always enjoy Frank's view of things. He's right again on this. BillZBubb Apr 2016 #13
No. 'Twas the voters, who wanted something for nothing. He, like others, just panders to them. jtuck004 Apr 2016 #15
oh well, the Dems got their woman, let's see if they can with her Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #16
Oh Really? You mean the Democratic Party that was so bad Sanders wouldn't join it? SunSeeker Apr 2016 #17
Yeah. THAT Democratic Party. jmowreader Apr 2016 #20
seems a lot of people have you on their ignore list redruddyred Apr 2016 #35
I guess we now know what moderate Republicans felt like when their Party took a hard right turn Dustlawyer Apr 2016 #22
You have it exactly the opposite ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #25
Sorry, I'm a love-filled Green & not frustrated, nor a Communist. southerncrone Apr 2016 #27
If you're merely *FOR* Sanders, and not hating on Clinton... ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #34
nietzche redruddyred Apr 2016 #36
Indeed, he has a superb quote for all the sanctimonious hard left ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #37
hillary is honest redruddyred Apr 2016 #38
Indeed. Hillary *IS* honest. ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #40
maybe cos she keeps LYING about my boy redruddyred Apr 2016 #43
You need to check your "Reality" I think it's a bubble! Dustlawyer Apr 2016 #29
You need to check the election results before making that accusation... ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #33
I will agree to disagree with most of what you said. I have never guaranteed victory for Bernie. Dustlawyer Apr 2016 #42
K&R Carolina Apr 2016 #47
Why should Bernie treat the DP with any . . FairWinds Apr 2016 #23
Just another sore loser who was wrong in his predictions. Merit people.....merit. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #26
"conniving in their own ruin". Yep. And HRC is just the same. antigop Apr 2016 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #31
But,wait! Bernie Sanders was trying to stop that. DianaForRussFeingold Apr 2016 #41
In retrospect, this is true-- Bill sucked Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #44
knr nt slipslidingaway Apr 2016 #45
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Thomas Frank: It's Clinto...»Reply #47