Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Showing Original Post only (View all)Thomas Frank: What ever happened to the party of the people? [View all]
Author and Kansas City native son Thomas Frank returned to his hometown to talk about what's wrong with the Democratic Party in support of his new book 'Listen, Liberal'.
Following on the tradition of his popular book 'What's the Matter with Kansas' which carefully chronicled how the Republican Party of Lincoln has been seduced and deliberately taken over by extremist ideologues of the far right, Frank now makes the case that the Democratic Party has also been taken over by a type of conservative ideology that, while not promoting economic inequality, certainly rationalizes it.
While Republican "establishment" figures revere the accumulation of wealth as a sign of 'winning' which somehow makes them automatically somehow qualified --or entitled-- to govern, The Democratic "establishment" believes that the world is a 'meritocracy' where the elites of the 'professional class' are best suited to govern based on their superior educational attainment and connections.
Frank asserts that the two political parties dominated by societal elites have systemically failed the workers in America, resulting in a space for populism to naturally grow into.
Following on the tradition of his popular book 'What's the Matter with Kansas' which carefully chronicled how the Republican Party of Lincoln has been seduced and deliberately taken over by extremist ideologues of the far right, Frank now makes the case that the Democratic Party has also been taken over by a type of conservative ideology that, while not promoting economic inequality, certainly rationalizes it.
While Republican "establishment" figures revere the accumulation of wealth as a sign of 'winning' which somehow makes them automatically somehow qualified --or entitled-- to govern, The Democratic "establishment" believes that the world is a 'meritocracy' where the elites of the 'professional class' are best suited to govern based on their superior educational attainment and connections.
Frank asserts that the two political parties dominated by societal elites have systemically failed the workers in America, resulting in a space for populism to naturally grow into.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Third Way and the warmongers infiltrated it. It, as we know it, is gone. n/t
djean111
May 2016
#1
I had not really been aware of how close Clinton got to privatizing Social Security.
NorthCarolina
May 2016
#3
According to some, affirmative. When that much money $ and favor is exchanged,
appalachiablue
May 2016
#38
That would be advisable from their perspective. Thanks for posting Tommy's book
appalachiablue
May 2016
#41
For sure. Dismantling the landmark legislation the Democratic Party was all about,
appalachiablue
May 2016
#43
'Katy Bar the Door!' DEM. SEN. MARK WARNER (VA) URGES RICH TO CHALLENGE POPULIST ANGER, May 2
appalachiablue
May 2016
#48
This has been in the works for 20+ years and Warner sounds like Full Speed Ahead,
appalachiablue
May 2016
#53
Sorry to but in, made me think of the famous nursery rhyme, 'Monday's Child'
appalachiablue
May 2016
#46
Charles Koch did, trying to look bipartisan, playing games- Sunday News show, ABC maybe.
appalachiablue
May 2016
#44
This is some of the best political analysis out there currently, in my opinion.
highprincipleswork
May 2016
#29
The US had the No. 1 world's largest middle class until 2014 which the Democratic Party
appalachiablue
May 2016
#45