Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
25. Are we switching parties again?
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:09 PM
May 2016

Not for social reasons, but maybe for economical reasons. Maybe this means we need more parties to represent the people.

So let's sum this up.

Dems are no longer the party of the working class, but instead the highly educated professionals.

The world opens up for them. The time that you spend top at universities, defines you as an individual. Worth is established by achievement at graduate school. Meritocracy. The conviction that those at the top deserve their rewards because they are the best. Meritocracy is not a doctrine for mitigating inequality...this is a doctrine for rationalizing inequality.

Everyone gets what they deserve by how they did in school. You got straight A's..that's awesome...you're going to be doing really well. You didn't finish high school, you should be picking up cans on the side of the road.

There is no solidarity in a Meritocracy. It is the exact opposite idea. You didn't make the grade? Well too goddamn bad.

Our "left" party has chosen, over the last 30 years, to turn it's back on the working party and it's concerns, and make themselves into the tribune of the enlightened professional class...the creative class.

All of the rest of us...suck it baby.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Third Way and the warmongers infiltrated it. It, as we know it, is gone. n/t djean111 May 2016 #1
I had not really been aware of how close Clinton got to privatizing Social Security. NorthCarolina May 2016 #3
And fate was a blue dress. What a joke of a presidency, in a way. n/t djean111 May 2016 #4
Some of what happened and continues. appalachiablue May 2016 #33
Will Hillary carry that same water? nt NorthCarolina May 2016 #36
According to some, affirmative. When that much money $ and favor is exchanged, appalachiablue May 2016 #38
I suspect given the NorthCarolina May 2016 #40
That would be advisable from their perspective. Thanks for posting Tommy's book appalachiablue May 2016 #41
Excellent post, thank you dreamnightwind May 2016 #42
For sure. Dismantling the landmark legislation the Democratic Party was all about, appalachiablue May 2016 #43
Yes, and I'm always afraid a corporate Democrat can get this done dreamnightwind May 2016 #47
'Katy Bar the Door!' DEM. SEN. MARK WARNER (VA) URGES RICH TO CHALLENGE POPULIST ANGER, May 2 appalachiablue May 2016 #48
Thx for spreading this around dreamnightwind May 2016 #50
This has been in the works for 20+ years and Warner sounds like Full Speed Ahead, appalachiablue May 2016 #53
Sold to the highest bidder nt abelenkpe May 2016 #2
book my next must read dembotoz May 2016 #5
Wonder who would win if only the 1% were voting for Trump jwirr May 2016 #6
Hillary. abelenkpe May 2016 #9
Oops I forgot that. To me it seems that both candidates are jwirr May 2016 #10
I understand abelenkpe May 2016 #11
extremely depressed today PADemD May 2016 #17
Don't know 10-1-41? Not idea if that was a Friday. jwirr May 2016 #18
It was a Wednesday. PADemD May 2016 #19
Interesting. I am seldom depressed but for some reason am jwirr May 2016 #20
The emotional cycle affects PADemD May 2016 #22
Do you have a link to more on this? Probably not a good day jwirr May 2016 #26
Please see my PM to you. PADemD May 2016 #27
Sorry to but in, made me think of the famous nursery rhyme, 'Monday's Child' appalachiablue May 2016 #46
Can buy the Clintons for cheap. Trump doesn't care, he always had money. Ikonoklast May 2016 #30
Charles Koch did, trying to look bipartisan, playing games- Sunday News show, ABC maybe. appalachiablue May 2016 #44
They realized we would vote for them no matter what? vi5 May 2016 #7
"They have no where else to go." abelenkpe May 2016 #8
This guy is a republican? passiveporcupine May 2016 #12
Frank: "There's no solidarity in a meritocracy." immoderate May 2016 #13
The banks foreclosed on it. Fuddnik May 2016 #14
He was interviewed on WNYC today on Leoonard Lopate's show dorkzilla May 2016 #15
Thanks Dork Z passiveporcupine May 2016 #23
He does! dorkzilla May 2016 #28
I'm not a fan of Frank at all... SylviaD May 2016 #16
Of course it turns you off, passiveporcupine May 2016 #24
Thanks for that. :( Very unnecessary. nt SylviaD May 2016 #51
if you find being exposes for "who you really are" offensive passiveporcupine May 2016 #52
Hillary is going to be the biggest disappointment in your life. Ikonoklast May 2016 #31
He did not provide any answers zeemike May 2016 #34
We need a central party Puppyjive May 2016 #21
Are we switching parties again? passiveporcupine May 2016 #25
Porcupine, not so passive this time. longship May 2016 #32
This is some of the best political analysis out there currently, in my opinion. highprincipleswork May 2016 #29
A very good analysis felix_numinous May 2016 #35
At the very end of his presentation NorthCarolina May 2016 #37
Yes felix_numinous May 2016 #39
The US had the No. 1 world's largest middle class until 2014 which the Democratic Party appalachiablue May 2016 #45
k and r nt Rebkeh May 2016 #49
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Thomas Frank: What ever h...»Reply #25