Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Clinton Email Scandal: State Department Was In On Cover-Up [View all]Android3.14
(5,402 posts)50. And it only took voter suppression, party strong arm tactics & a unified corporate media
to stifle the efforts of an obscure New York Jew with actual ethics.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The way it's coming across now is that it's the content of those emails and the donations that went
4bucksagallon
May 2016
#3
Why are you promoting Justice Watch's lawsuit against the "radical Obama administration"?
pnwmom
May 2016
#7
Why are you supporting someone who peddles their influence, supports wars based on lies, etc.?
Android3.14
May 2016
#13
Judicial Watch is a far right wing-nut org that shouldn't be promoted here by anyone.
pnwmom
May 2016
#14
Yes, they are a nasty organization to be sure... However, they have gone to court in a civil law
glowing
May 2016
#17
What is crazy are DUers posting this request for help in a lawsuit against Obama's radical agenda
pnwmom
May 2016
#21
This has nothing to do with "Obama's radical agenda"! This is the information that is being gleaned
glowing
May 2016
#31
This video contains that message printed boldly across the picture. Can't you see it?
pnwmom
May 2016
#33
Everyone laughed at the Enquirer breaking the John Edwards affair because it was the Enquirer.
glowing
May 2016
#41
Analysis of popular votes in caucus states has shown that Sanders only got about 300,000 more....
George II
May 2016
#51
And it only took voter suppression, party strong arm tactics & a unified corporate media
Android3.14
May 2016
#50
All the caucuses themselves are the biggest form of voter suppression. It's what they're for. n/t
pnwmom
May 2016
#57
They haven't suppressed a single vote. Could you please name an election -- ever -- where the
pnwmom
May 2016
#59
It isn't news that Bill has been making speeches and donating the fees to his charitable foundation.
pnwmom
May 2016
#6
Why are you pushing Judicial Watch's promotion of its lawsuit against "Obama's radical agenda?"
pnwmom
May 2016
#8
It's not so much "Judicial Watch"... They have a civil law suit. The Judge is a Bill Clinton
glowing
May 2016
#25
Oh, yeah, there will be devastating stuff in her emails. I just read a shocking article about that
pnwmom
May 2016
#39
There won't be incriminating stuff in her emails. If she wanted to do something sketchy
pnwmom
May 2016
#43
And they sent 300,000 Christmas cards from the White House and that was another HUGE scandal!
pnwmom
May 2016
#35
So --Mike is pushing the RW smear of it being a cover-up! And Sanders fans will bow down and
riversedge
May 2016
#28