Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Rep. Ellison Predicts Trump's Success; Beltway Insiders on "This Week" Panel Laugh in His Face [View all]Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)72. By shoring up his base
Grimes did the same in her 2011 run for SoS of Kentucky, by pushing progressive ideals. She won by the largest margin in Kentucky history by doing this.
She then mounted a 2014 senatorial bid against Mitch McConnell. Here was her keynote campaign ad:
This was her style for the senate campaign. She tried to play towards Kentucky Republicans, distancing herself from Obama, the Affordable Care Act, and - as you can see - yuckin' it up over guns and football.
She lost, by 15.6%.
Now that's a pretty big change in three years. As far as I can tell, she did just fine as Kentucky SoS, so it's not like she blew her own foot off between 2011 and 2014. It looks to me as if the difference is due to the divergence between her Secretary of State campaign and her Senatorial campaign. She ran as a progressive for the first and won overwhelmingly, she ran as a conservative on the latter and lost easily.
What's important to remember is that this country is NOT split 50/50. People with Democratic / Liberal-leaning views outnumber peopel with Republican / Conservative-leaning views. The trick is to motivate them to vote. And the best way to motivate liberal-leaning people to vote, is to give them something they want to vote for - Liberal candidates, with liberal positions. Not just "more liberal than a right-wing asshole" but genuinely liberal in positions and ideology.
It's fine to appeal to Republicans, but the way to do it is to be like "this is why my liberal ideas are good for everyone, including you" and NOT "I will adopt your conservative ideas if only you'll please pretty pelase vote for me please"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rep. Ellison Predicts Trump's Success; Beltway Insiders on "This Week" Panel Laugh in His Face [View all]
Chakab
May 2016
OP
Does anyone else remember when the democratic establishment wanted to run against Nixon?
Vincardog
May 2016
#3
Funny how it will be the "retarded" "insignificant" "irrelevant" LEFT responsible when HRC goes
Vincardog
May 2016
#7
Trumps weaknesses are Bernie's strengths. HRC can not attack Trump on his Corporatist policies. Well
Vincardog
May 2016
#13
Trump Does Have Weaknesses. We'd Be Best Served Attacking Them and Not Our Own Candidates'.
The_Counsel
May 2016
#24
Hillary represents the extremists, today. Bernie represents the moderates and the independents. (nt)
w4rma
May 2016
#21
So state some facts. How and where is HRC's position(s) better than Bernie's?
Vincardog
May 2016
#29
The person I replied to twisted themself into saying that Sanders is more moderate than Clinton.
Thor_MN
May 2016
#34
Will Trump or Clinton gather the critical mass of haters together to hate their opponent?
w4rma
May 2016
#53
You don't hate Trump? Aren't you voting for Clinton to keep Trump from winning? (nt)
w4rma
May 2016
#55
My entire point is that I don't support Clinton, because her campaign, with her unfavorables, is
w4rma
May 2016
#57
I do listen to all of the candidates. But, I also realize neither Trump nor Hillary tell the truth.
w4rma
May 2016
#59
You keep on hating, lying about your intentions and pushing for policies that create more hate. (nt)
w4rma
May 2016
#62
This thread shows you have absolutely NOT been "neutral". I'm calling bullshit on you.
w4rma
May 2016
#66
I haven't seen shaky projection like that since the last time I was at a drive-in
Scootaloo
May 2016
#28
I never thought there would be a case to highlight binary thinking on the left.
Thor_MN
May 2016
#35
You are trying to squirm into your own ltttle construction to be in your comfort zone.
Thor_MN
May 2016
#44
Honestly, I See Neither Hillary Nor Bernie "Bringing in More Voters" at the End of the Day.
The_Counsel
May 2016
#69
So Again ... How Did Barack Obama Get Elected--Twice--to Such a Large Electoral Majority...?
The_Counsel
May 2016
#71
I'll take a stab at answering your question--because it's a damned important one.
Old Crow
May 2016
#32
Wait! Is "retarted" some sort of double slam at Hillary or just a misspelling like "irrelivent"?
maddiemom
May 2016
#17
Send this around folks: Parasitic, overpaid and inbred Pundit Class at work.
appalachiablue
May 2016
#15
Let gas go up shortly b4 the election and kick everyone's pocketbook for about a month -
jtuck004
May 2016
#20