Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Strip & Flip Voter Suppression Exposed... [View all]questionseverything
(11,862 posts)51. screens change all the time
http://bradblog.com/?p=7875
2,699 Republican votes have now disappeared! There were reportedly 2,793 Republican voters on May 19th, but just 94 as of May 25th! Neat trick!
To top it all off, even after all of these mystery adjustments, the "total votes" cast in Monroe County as of May 21st, as shown above, is said to be 2,159 --- so, despite the radical change in results, the county's 0% undervote rate stayed intact. Every single voter who cast a vote in either the Republican or Democratic Primary election on May 18th voted in the Senate election, at least according to the Arkansas Sec. of State.
The "good" news? In the CD1 race, while the number of Republican voters has dropped by 229 (to 89 total) and the number of Democratic votes has increased by 60 (to 1,920 total), at least there are not now more Democratic votes than physically possible, as with the county's original numbers on May 19th.
So What The Hell Is Going On?
It's taken a week or so of going from one election official to another to to unwind the mess, and only some of the anomalies detailed above were finally explained.
///////////////////////////
we know ohio in 2004 had a mirror site that changed the outcome...if your work is saying that votes were flipped before the mirror site was posted, that is possible too but evidently any flipping prior to the mirror site wasn't enough
2,699 Republican votes have now disappeared! There were reportedly 2,793 Republican voters on May 19th, but just 94 as of May 25th! Neat trick!
To top it all off, even after all of these mystery adjustments, the "total votes" cast in Monroe County as of May 21st, as shown above, is said to be 2,159 --- so, despite the radical change in results, the county's 0% undervote rate stayed intact. Every single voter who cast a vote in either the Republican or Democratic Primary election on May 18th voted in the Senate election, at least according to the Arkansas Sec. of State.
The "good" news? In the CD1 race, while the number of Republican voters has dropped by 229 (to 89 total) and the number of Democratic votes has increased by 60 (to 1,920 total), at least there are not now more Democratic votes than physically possible, as with the county's original numbers on May 19th.
So What The Hell Is Going On?
It's taken a week or so of going from one election official to another to to unwind the mess, and only some of the anomalies detailed above were finally explained.
///////////////////////////
we know ohio in 2004 had a mirror site that changed the outcome...if your work is saying that votes were flipped before the mirror site was posted, that is possible too but evidently any flipping prior to the mirror site wasn't enough
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Unreliable, anonymous sources don't help the situation. Who is behind that stuff?
L. Coyote
May 2016
#22
Charnin's methods are flawed, his own creation and not even real statistical methodology.
L. Coyote
May 2016
#48
What, that old Brad blog from 2010 is supposed to do what, support bad statistics or a bogus book?
L. Coyote
May 2016
#53
the bradblog i posted should let any thinking person know that what the state posts as results
questionseverything
May 2016
#55
Why repeat allegations in Arnebeck's lawsuit if they are not factual and the conclusions false.
L. Coyote
May 2016
#56
your chart only deals with 2004, so you are comparing apples and oranges
questionseverything
May 2016
#57
And, too many people don't have an Internet connection fast enough to watch YouTube
scscholar
May 2016
#32
Every web connection is fast enough to watch YouTubes, you just have to load them.
L. Coyote
May 2016
#50
It's said over and over on here....same things...denial cuz they want to win at any cost
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#30
On your first post, you accuse a Democratic candidate of electioon fraud. Enjoy your stay.
L. Coyote
May 2016
#36