Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Strip & Flip Voter Suppression Exposed... [View all]L. Coyote
(51,134 posts)How does that change any of what i said. Is this unrelated anecdotal evidence?
In 2004, Ohio hired a tech firm to post their results online, which they did. Ohio counties report their votes to the Ohio SoS and they post those online. The counties know their vote totals, they later do official vote total results, all in accord with the law. Not one vote changed. No county reported that their vote results were altered in any way. All that server bullshit arises years later in a lawsuit being severely lost by none other that Wasserman himself, after the case was already thrown out once I think. It is a nothing story, a fairy tale for the wanna-believers, sort of like the kid who discovered a lost Maya city using the stars and Google earth from his bedroom, and then someone who knows better (me) says, "Hey, that's a corn field, not a lost city," but everyone wants to believe the false story anyway and it just keeps getting reposted without anyone employing one iota of critical reasoning.
Baltimore's election results decertified, state begins precinct-level review of irregularities
Aviel Rubin, a computer science professor at the Johns Hopkins University and expert in electronic voting, said there are a number of explanations for why there could be discrepancies between the number of check-ins and the number of ballots cast, including faulty equipment, errors by elections judges and mistakes by voters. Rubin has worked as an election judge in Maryland. .....
Foul play, he said, should only be considered if election officials rule out all other possibilities or have evidence of wrongdoing.
"Without knowing what happened, you can't rule out anything," he said. "You can't rule out that there was some foul play. That's not the first conclusion you should draw." .........