Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Strip & Flip Voter Suppression Exposed... [View all]L. Coyote
(51,134 posts)54. Except, that is patently false.
Lots of people studied the exit polls, and TruthisAll was trying to do the same but used flawed methods. He was soundly rejected here on DU. He doesn't handle rejection well, to put it mildly.
Here is what the 2004 election really looked like (view image to see full sized graphic):

2004 Presidential Election Results, the Exit Polls vs. the Vote Counts Excel spreadsheet.
You are not going to accomplish much quoting an unreliable source. And, when did you invent your new rule in statistics about those odds being statistically zero?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Unreliable, anonymous sources don't help the situation. Who is behind that stuff?
L. Coyote
May 2016
#22
Charnin's methods are flawed, his own creation and not even real statistical methodology.
L. Coyote
May 2016
#48
What, that old Brad blog from 2010 is supposed to do what, support bad statistics or a bogus book?
L. Coyote
May 2016
#53
the bradblog i posted should let any thinking person know that what the state posts as results
questionseverything
May 2016
#55
Why repeat allegations in Arnebeck's lawsuit if they are not factual and the conclusions false.
L. Coyote
May 2016
#56
your chart only deals with 2004, so you are comparing apples and oranges
questionseverything
May 2016
#57
And, too many people don't have an Internet connection fast enough to watch YouTube
scscholar
May 2016
#32
Every web connection is fast enough to watch YouTubes, you just have to load them.
L. Coyote
May 2016
#50
It's said over and over on here....same things...denial cuz they want to win at any cost
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#30
On your first post, you accuse a Democratic candidate of electioon fraud. Enjoy your stay.
L. Coyote
May 2016
#36