Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
43. The DNC, Schultz, and a few other assorted items on my mind.
Mon May 16, 2016, 08:53 PM
May 2016

You've got the head of the DNC leading the Democrats on a questionable path. She was very likely put into her position based on her ties to Clinton. So many democrats (particularly moderate) are protective of the Clintons for various reasons, but Debbie isn't putting us on a path we should be on in my opinion. So... What's to say Clinton will do any better when she enters the White house?

As of right now Clinton is for continuing the Obama legacy, but what parts? Obamacare? Okay, that's nice, but Obamacare isn't perfect. We should strive for something better, a la Sanders' single payer. A lot of the fight over single payer is that it is unfeasible for various reason and yet it is implemented in many countries. I think it is more a matter of trying to protect the insurance industry and all the lobbying money that comes with it.

Remember: Insurance companies are in it to turn a profit. If that means capping your coverage or not allowing you the best course of treatment because it's too expensive... well, then it's probably not a good system.

Last I heard Hillary wanted to put Bill in control of fixing the economy (link). The 90's were great in a lot of aspects, but having Bill kowtow to republicans on deregulating wallstreet wasn't one of them. Stocks can only go up so long before it all comes crashing down, taking everyone with it.

Also, haven't a lot of people been saying Bill just doesn't have 'it' nowadays? Why would she want to put his name at the forefront of an economic recovery when he seems to be losing his touch a bit as of late. My best guess: Name recognition and nostalgia.

Most of all, I'm tired of people scraping by a meager living with less hope for building a better life for their families. I don't feel that Clinton is empathetic to their plight. That's just my opinion. Parading people up on stage with stories of woe then giving them a hug is nice, but it doesn't fix anything. Clinton doesn't seem to want to fix anything so much as keep the status quo.

Politicians lie and pander all of the time, but Clinton seems to more than most. I'm sorry. It's truth. Sometimes the truth does hurt.

Yeah... I'm angry with how this election cycle has gone and want more liberal, people-minded folks in government. Not just those looking for an ego stroke and power. I'm glad that Sanders seems to have woken up some of the liberal contingent into running for office. It'll be good for the democratic party in the long run, you know, actually fighting for people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R yuiyoshida May 2016 #1
She did not just "allow" it. She rammed it down our throats. yourout May 2016 #2
No DWS has done nothing of the Kind: Stop the bulling of DWS lewebley3 May 2016 #77
Obviously you have not been paying attention. shakedown1970 May 2016 #87
Allowed. Enabled. The Plan all along n/t arcane1 May 2016 #3
We desperately need to throw the corporatist bastards out of our "People's Party". nm rhett o rick May 2016 #4
Your "we" is who, exactly? Cary May 2016 #33
The Progressive Wing of our Party. Conservatives need to go back to the Republicon Party rhett o rick May 2016 #34
Really? Cary May 2016 #37
Here's a test. rhett o rick May 2016 #40
Focus, Rhett Cary May 2016 #41
I don't want to be the decider and didn't ask for such. The progressive wing of our party rhett o rick May 2016 #42
It doesn't work that way. Cary May 2016 #44
Hey you support the rich and powerful at the expense of those suffering. I am sure you can rhett o rick May 2016 #45
Yes of course it's all about me personally Cary May 2016 #46
I believe Rhett is being passionate about his allegiance chwaliszewski May 2016 #47
Rhett changed the subject to me, personally Cary May 2016 #50
Actually, I believe... chwaliszewski May 2016 #52
Nope. Cary May 2016 #57
Actually, I think you are trying to goad someone into posting something remotely alertable. Hiraeth May 2016 #60
I find it fascinating that the radical left will not listen Cary May 2016 #59
I find it fascinating that you have not posted anything in this thread that is worth listening to. Hiraeth May 2016 #61
And how is that Howard Roarke attitude working out for ya? Cary May 2016 #62
Ayn called. Wants her book back. Hiraeth May 2016 #64
What's that supposed to mean? Cary May 2016 #65
You are actually using Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged to make your argument? fbc May 2016 #70
I can be "actually using" whatever I want to be "actually using." Cary May 2016 #72
You can be doing anything you want. fbc May 2016 #73
There you go again changing the subject to Cary sucks Cary May 2016 #76
Do you intentionally craft absurd arguments to play the victim? fbc May 2016 #81
There you go again with your changing the subject to "Cary sucks" Cary May 2016 #86
condensation? puffy socks May 2016 #84
I agree with your list. We get what we condone. ReasonableToo May 2016 #49
You are a proud apologist for corruption. Congratulations. shakedown1970 May 2016 #88
And what exactly do you have to show for that sanctimonious blather? Cary May 2016 #96
agree, but here's the problem Ferd Berfel May 2016 #79
She made it so. She gave them the keys gladly. nt stillwaiting May 2016 #5
The plan of the majority of party Progressive dog May 2016 #6
The plan of the majority of party has always been to nominate a Democrat, AlbertCat May 2016 #7
Even if she is a Democrat in name only. TryLogic May 2016 #10
I thought she was a corporation - HRC-WJC, Inc. with the CVC-Mevinsky PLC subsidiary GoneOffShore May 2016 #20
Hey... IthinkThereforeIAM May 2016 #31
I'm glad you understood, Progressive dog May 2016 #91
Party membership is not the Holy Grail Trajan May 2016 #11
So Bernie should run under his "political philosophy", not as a Democrat Progressive dog May 2016 #90
What a bunch of hooey Trajan May 2016 #92
Most are pacifists, Progressive dog May 2016 #95
"The Majority of Today's Elected Democrats Are Moderate Republicans" -- Chomsky TryLogic May 2016 #12
Chomsky-that says it all Progressive dog May 2016 #89
along with her 'mentor.' elleng May 2016 #8
It is going to stop. One way or another. Enthusiast May 2016 #9
Corporations believe notemason May 2016 #13
"allowed" ananda May 2016 #14
FIRE DWS! Donate to Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23 here Omaha Steve May 2016 #15
Thanks, OS! Duval May 2016 #93
DWS will stay until her job is done. zeemike May 2016 #16
i thought it was insuring that payday lenders get to enslave the lowest income workers... Human101948 May 2016 #18
They can pass it without her. zeemike May 2016 #21
DWS has been very fair: Sanders has been rejected by the voters not DWS lewebley3 May 2016 #78
Oh, right! Hence none came to hear him speak in your HO? Duval May 2016 #94
DWS - chief of staff? TexasMommaWithAHat May 2016 #97
Probably shooting for something higher than that. zeemike May 2016 #98
The loss of House and Senate seats randr May 2016 #17
What a bombshell!! RiverNoord May 2016 #19
My Gawd, this woman is awful! jalan48 May 2016 #22
At least she did not allow the oligarchy to take over, and doubtful she allowed corporations Thinkingabout May 2016 #23
.....And people say the G.O.P. is imploding! n/t TIME TO PANIC May 2016 #24
Republicants in BOTH parties are in deep do do. Long past time too. Vincardog May 2016 #69
Amen! n/t TIME TO PANIC May 2016 #74
DISGUSTING...Kick Her OUT!!!! billhicks76 May 2016 #25
Not news, not at all. This is why we support Bernie. What DWS has not done is turned the DNC over Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #26
You mean like our half black president? dlwickham May 2016 #67
Yet a Dem Administration is deporting more people than Bush. Rafale May 2016 #27
Why do the rest of the DNC executives --who know better-- allow this shit to continue? 99th_Monkey May 2016 #28
Gabbard's first name is "Tulsi" whathehell May 2016 #39
Was going to post that it was more than "allowed", Babel_17 May 2016 #29
Debbie and the Debbies... IthinkThereforeIAM May 2016 #30
Got news for ya Gman May 2016 #32
give me a break hsergott May 2016 #35
Your grasp of history is...underwelming blackspade May 2016 #55
Your lack of perspective is atrocious Gman May 2016 #58
Really. Do tell.... blackspade May 2016 #63
K&R dchill May 2016 #36
I just hope to hell.... ReRe May 2016 #38
The DNC, Schultz, and a few other assorted items on my mind. PoliticalMalcontent May 2016 #43
That was a wonderful post me b zola May 2016 #83
Thanks. PoliticalMalcontent May 2016 #99
Number of voters identifying as Dems is at a record low eridani May 2016 #48
Maybe they are staring to go back to the republican party. fbc May 2016 #71
The plan was in place long before DWS. bunchofpenguins May 2016 #51
I am just about done with the party SmittynMo May 2016 #53
I was disgusted by a thread yesterday.. freebrew May 2016 #66
Not 'allowed.' Facilitated would be a better word. blackspade May 2016 #54
At least someone besides her is running it... nt Gore1FL May 2016 #56
becoming corporatist/fascist-lite was what the DLC was all about stupidicus May 2016 #68
Dem bashing again. Maybe go over to, you know, that other place, the dark side L. Coyote May 2016 #75
She sought them out. zentrum May 2016 #80
Allowed is not the right word quakerboy May 2016 #82
You know what else is going to happen if Clinton is rammed through as the Dem bjo59 May 2016 #85
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Debbie Wasserman Schultz ...»Reply #43