Video & Multimedia

bjobotts

(9,141 posts)

62. She had 700 pledged super delegates before campaigns ever started.Running for pres past 25yrs

Thu May 19, 2016, 04:02 PM

May 2016

Look who heads the DNC-Clinton supporter. Who runs the states primaries and caucuses...Clinton supporters. MSNBC in the bag for Clinton. Benen blogging at the Maddow blog never says anything negative about Clinton but every story on Sanders is negative and biased. It's the process not the moment. Forget Clinton and Sanders for a moment and look at what has happened to the Dem party and what it stands for today. It's why Bernie has been so successful bringing so many young people into the process...he stands for the people and is not a multimillionaire spokes person for the Money party.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

76 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Man PROVES software stole votes in ALL 'Hillary won' counties [View all] berniesandero May 2016 OP

Desperation is not an honorable trait. tonyt53 May 2016 #1

Have you ever heard of 'strip and flip'? Land of Enchantment May 2016 #4

Here Ned_Devine May 2016 #7

Gotcha. Land of Enchantment May 2016 #8

More hard hitting investigating from our super sleuths. How do you find all this hidden secret data Ohioblue22 May 2016 #19

.. frylock May 2016 #23

Yep Ned_Devine May 2016 #26

it's disturbing as anything Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #12

Sanders has lost fair and square: lewebley3 May 2016 #15

first, he hasn't lost yet Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #18

Sanders has lost: he is lying to his supporters lewebley3 May 2016 #30

A huge number of people have rejected Sanders: Hillary has the votes lewebley3 May 2016 #73

when the republicans pull the same shit on $hillary Cheap_Trick May 2016 #45

You are sick, you would be laughing at the people that would be lewebley3 May 2016 #46

Funny coming from you. Hillary 840high May 2016 #57

Can't prove it.Not with these privatemachines counting votes.Not fair or square all over the country bjobotts May 2016 #59

yeah, why is Hillary so freaking desperate to win that she has to cheat? Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #13

Hillary would be last person to cheat: She ran great campaign: lewebley3 May 2016 #16

Is he? Just like Hillary in 2008? Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #17

The DNC kicked out Michigan and Florida to give Obama the win lewebley3 May 2016 #28

LOL! Plucketeer May 2016 #50

Go back and look at her last campaign with Obama.Then you'll get the picture bjobotts May 2016 #60

She had 700 pledged super delegates before campaigns ever started.Running for pres past 25yrs bjobotts May 2016 #62

And neither is ignorance. frylock May 2016 #22

PPP is not an honorable career choice. BillZBubb May 2016 #32

wow, thanny for moving the conversation forward! Onward soldier!! floppyboo May 2016 #56

This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #2

I really did not hear an explanation. JDPriestly May 2016 #3

This is exactly what I was thinking... metroins May 2016 #47

Neither did I. senz May 2016 #49

Kind of hard to prove something when Democracy is on a timer Joob May 2016 #74

True. That's why I asked. I thought there might be a blog somewhere that explains this. JDPriestly May 2016 #75

The shenanigans meter is pinning the scale at 6 times the level established by the State Department GoneFishin May 2016 #5

But who is going to prosecute them? zeemike May 2016 #21

No one. No one ever will because this is a partisan country and both sides do it. LiberalArkie May 2016 #27

I wish it were tin foil, but Kerry was the clear winner in 2004, and Gore in 2000 larkrake May 2016 #53

BSS need to adjust tin foil hats-they are getting too tight redstateblues May 2016 #6

You must wear yours over your eyes and ears bjobotts May 2016 #61

The correct term here is 'election fraud', not 'voter fraud'. The voter did nothing wrong. ViseGrip May 2016 #9

+1! Enthusiast May 2016 #64

Black Box------------------Brad Friedman - turbinetree May 2016 #10

He did not prove anything. He implied causation but he certainly did not prove it. LonePirate May 2016 #11

true, unfortunately he did not prove it Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #14

Keep that tinfoil hat tight, or the aliens get you with their mind ray. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #20

Yes because we know no election has ever been stolen. zeemike May 2016 #24

One requires proof of wrong-doing before jumping to conclusions. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #29

Climate change denier says what? BillZBubb May 2016 #33

There's proof of climate change, sir. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #35

Have you ever heard of a smoking gun? zeemike May 2016 #37

There is no smoking gun. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #38

Bullshit. zeemike May 2016 #39

Hillary won NY fair and square. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #41

Again, there is no proof if there is no invistagation. zeemike May 2016 #43

There is no proof because there is nothing. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #44

It's funny to see so-called Democrats mocking election fraud. frylock May 2016 #25

No one is mocking election fraud. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #31

Yeah, get over it. frylock May 2016 #40

There was fraud in FL in 2000. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #42

There was fraud in NY in 2016. Enthusiast May 2016 #65

Proof? nt Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #66

I don't need proof because you know it is true and I know it is true. Enthusiast May 2016 #67

No, proof is pretty much a requirement for claims of fraud. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #69

In a world of smoke and mirrors the paid obfuscators inhabit. Enthusiast May 2016 #70

In a world of science and reason, you mean. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #71

Bernie has way more hackers on his side if anybody is hacking the vote it's him MattP May 2016 #34

It does matter who or what party you support. The voting and counting in this country needs a major Skwmom May 2016 #36

did we really land on the moon? stonecutter357 May 2016 #48

:-) riversedge May 2016 #52

This is why Oregon has been voting by mail for decades. DrBulldog May 2016 #51

This sounds good. stillwaiting May 2016 #72

I find irony alive and well. 1) The MSM controls the media...who, what and when libdem4life May 2016 #54

The State Department considers 2% variance fraud? felix_numinous May 2016 #55

Reminds me of Shrodinger's cat - who observes the results? floppyboo May 2016 #58

I suspect as much and more. But we wouldn't want Trump! Enthusiast May 2016 #63

In 2009, Democrats in DC had an opportunity to protect our elections and voting rights. Scuba May 2016 #68

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #76