Video & Multimedia

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)

75. True. That's why I asked. I thought there might be a blog somewhere that explains this.

Reply to Joob (Reply #74)

Fri May 20, 2016, 01:20 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

76 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Man PROVES software stole votes in ALL 'Hillary won' counties [View all] berniesandero May 2016 OP

Desperation is not an honorable trait. tonyt53 May 2016 #1

Have you ever heard of 'strip and flip'? Land of Enchantment May 2016 #4

Here Ned_Devine May 2016 #7

Gotcha. Land of Enchantment May 2016 #8

More hard hitting investigating from our super sleuths. How do you find all this hidden secret data Ohioblue22 May 2016 #19

.. frylock May 2016 #23

Yep Ned_Devine May 2016 #26

it's disturbing as anything Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #12

Sanders has lost fair and square: lewebley3 May 2016 #15

first, he hasn't lost yet Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #18

Sanders has lost: he is lying to his supporters lewebley3 May 2016 #30

A huge number of people have rejected Sanders: Hillary has the votes lewebley3 May 2016 #73

when the republicans pull the same shit on $hillary Cheap_Trick May 2016 #45

You are sick, you would be laughing at the people that would be lewebley3 May 2016 #46

Funny coming from you. Hillary 840high May 2016 #57

Can't prove it.Not with these privatemachines counting votes.Not fair or square all over the country bjobotts May 2016 #59

yeah, why is Hillary so freaking desperate to win that she has to cheat? Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #13

Hillary would be last person to cheat: She ran great campaign: lewebley3 May 2016 #16

Is he? Just like Hillary in 2008? Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #17

The DNC kicked out Michigan and Florida to give Obama the win lewebley3 May 2016 #28

LOL! Plucketeer May 2016 #50

Go back and look at her last campaign with Obama.Then you'll get the picture bjobotts May 2016 #60

She had 700 pledged super delegates before campaigns ever started.Running for pres past 25yrs bjobotts May 2016 #62

And neither is ignorance. frylock May 2016 #22

PPP is not an honorable career choice. BillZBubb May 2016 #32

wow, thanny for moving the conversation forward! Onward soldier!! floppyboo May 2016 #56

This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #2

I really did not hear an explanation. JDPriestly May 2016 #3

This is exactly what I was thinking... metroins May 2016 #47

Neither did I. senz May 2016 #49

Kind of hard to prove something when Democracy is on a timer Joob May 2016 #74

True. That's why I asked. I thought there might be a blog somewhere that explains this. JDPriestly May 2016 #75

The shenanigans meter is pinning the scale at 6 times the level established by the State Department GoneFishin May 2016 #5

But who is going to prosecute them? zeemike May 2016 #21

No one. No one ever will because this is a partisan country and both sides do it. LiberalArkie May 2016 #27

I wish it were tin foil, but Kerry was the clear winner in 2004, and Gore in 2000 larkrake May 2016 #53

BSS need to adjust tin foil hats-they are getting too tight redstateblues May 2016 #6

You must wear yours over your eyes and ears bjobotts May 2016 #61

The correct term here is 'election fraud', not 'voter fraud'. The voter did nothing wrong. ViseGrip May 2016 #9

+1! Enthusiast May 2016 #64

Black Box------------------Brad Friedman - turbinetree May 2016 #10

He did not prove anything. He implied causation but he certainly did not prove it. LonePirate May 2016 #11

true, unfortunately he did not prove it Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #14

Keep that tinfoil hat tight, or the aliens get you with their mind ray. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #20

Yes because we know no election has ever been stolen. zeemike May 2016 #24

One requires proof of wrong-doing before jumping to conclusions. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #29

Climate change denier says what? BillZBubb May 2016 #33

There's proof of climate change, sir. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #35

Have you ever heard of a smoking gun? zeemike May 2016 #37

There is no smoking gun. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #38

Bullshit. zeemike May 2016 #39

Hillary won NY fair and square. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #41

Again, there is no proof if there is no invistagation. zeemike May 2016 #43

There is no proof because there is nothing. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #44

It's funny to see so-called Democrats mocking election fraud. frylock May 2016 #25

No one is mocking election fraud. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #31

Yeah, get over it. frylock May 2016 #40

There was fraud in FL in 2000. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #42

There was fraud in NY in 2016. Enthusiast May 2016 #65

Proof? nt Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #66

I don't need proof because you know it is true and I know it is true. Enthusiast May 2016 #67

No, proof is pretty much a requirement for claims of fraud. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #69

In a world of smoke and mirrors the paid obfuscators inhabit. Enthusiast May 2016 #70

In a world of science and reason, you mean. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #71

Bernie has way more hackers on his side if anybody is hacking the vote it's him MattP May 2016 #34

It does matter who or what party you support. The voting and counting in this country needs a major Skwmom May 2016 #36

did we really land on the moon? stonecutter357 May 2016 #48

:-) riversedge May 2016 #52

This is why Oregon has been voting by mail for decades. DrBulldog May 2016 #51

This sounds good. stillwaiting May 2016 #72

I find irony alive and well. 1) The MSM controls the media...who, what and when libdem4life May 2016 #54

The State Department considers 2% variance fraud? felix_numinous May 2016 #55

Reminds me of Shrodinger's cat - who observes the results? floppyboo May 2016 #58

I suspect as much and more. But we wouldn't want Trump! Enthusiast May 2016 #63

In 2009, Democrats in DC had an opportunity to protect our elections and voting rights. Scuba May 2016 #68

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #76