Video & Multimedia

BlueNoMatterWho

(880 posts)

3. Not good

Reply to Donkees (Original post)

Mon May 30, 2016, 09:27 PM

May 2016

Trump supporter? How so?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

88 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Protester tries to attack Bernie Sanders at Oakland California Rally (5-30-16) [View all] Donkees May 2016 OP

Well that's scary. Agschmid May 2016 #1

Watch it Turn Out november3rd May 2016 #27

Really? shakedown1970 May 2016 #31

Uh huh. MynameisBlarney May 2016 #38

I'm glad he's safe. wallyworld2 May 2016 #39

Did he identify himself as a Trump supporter ? CentralMass May 2016 #2

That's the way the video is labeled by the live-streamer covering the rally (BSS&E). Donkees May 2016 #4

Odd that Sanders wouldn't be more accommodating to animal rights protesters. SunSeeker May 2016 #10

What a foul thing to say. I assumed you'd have the "sarcasm" smilie in your post, but FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #13

when you have no heart you can say anything. given our roguevalley May 2016 #18

Really? Are you accusing these 4 kids of being potential "political murderers"?! SunSeeker May 2016 #23

Why is it "foul"? Why wouldn't Sanders be more accommodating to animal rights protesters? SunSeeker May 2016 #19

It had nothing to do with Sanders. The Secret Service jumped on them Renew Deal May 2016 #25

But why did Sanders have to accuse the kids of trying to "intimidate" him? SunSeeker May 2016 #28

The Secret Service responded. It doesn't look like Bernie even noticed them until JDPriestly May 2016 #33

Well he certainly noticed the girls shouting their protest. SunSeeker May 2016 #34

How low can a Hillary supporter sink? JDPriestly May 2016 #36

I live in California. Free speech is indeed everywhere. SunSeeker May 2016 #41

Oh man! Plucketeer May 2016 #59

What do you mean why? liberalnarb May 2016 #56

Who physically attacked Sanders? This was just 4 kids shouting attention for animal rights. SunSeeker May 2016 #60

They jumped the barricade. liberalnarb May 2016 #62

They got nowhere near Sanders. That video shows they were just seeking attention for their cause. SunSeeker May 2016 #65

Oh, bull! If it had been Sanders supporters at a Hillary rally you people would lose your minds. liberalnarb May 2016 #67

These were not Clinton supporters protesting Sanders. They only sought attention for animal rights. SunSeeker May 2016 #69

"All the time" is an exaggeration. liberalnarb May 2016 #70

They did not "run at" Sanders. The two girls were holding onto each other. SunSeeker May 2016 #72

I think you mean "fowl" Renew Deal May 2016 #22

DUzy! SunSeeker May 2016 #24

That's what I was thinking... ybbor May 2016 #30

Yeah, how do we know? Duval May 2016 #5

Not good BlueNoMatterWho May 2016 #3

How do you know this is an attack? itsrobert May 2016 #6

Thanks. I was unable to make sense of what happened even watching it live. Gregorian May 2016 #7

This sound like some possible political $hit stirring. CentralMass May 2016 #8

Drama much? The protesters got nowhere near Sanders. SunSeeker May 2016 #9

I read they were Andy823 May 2016 #15

Yes, it appears they were animal rights protesters. And they did not attack Sanders. nt SunSeeker May 2016 #16

Luckily, there was no sniper fire. nt OnyxCollie May 2016 #17

Well, Sanders wasn't in a war zone in Bosnia. nt SunSeeker May 2016 #20

Nor did he lie about sniper fire. OnyxCollie May 2016 #21

Someone's definitely trying to sell some drama here! SunSeeker May 2016 #26

Animal rights protestors are very active in California. JDPriestly May 2016 #35

But why did he have to accuse these kids of trying to intimidate him? SunSeeker May 2016 #37

We don't know what he saw. JDPriestly May 2016 #40

Luckily, there's a video. Check it out in the OP. nt SunSeeker May 2016 #42

I watched it. We do not see the audience from the vantage point of the Secret Service. JDPriestly May 2016 #44

I totally agree the Secret Service did their job. But why the Sanders outburst about intimidation? SunSeeker May 2016 #45

Apparently the reports state that they crossed the barrier. JDPriestly May 2016 #46

The protesters were not "intimidating" or attacking Sanders. SunSeeker May 2016 #48

It sounds like you have a few issues yourself. chwaliszewski May 2016 #52

Why are my posts pointing out facts bothering you so much? SunSeeker May 2016 #68

'Dude has issues' is not a fact; it's your opinion. chwaliszewski May 2016 #78

You are the one with issues. OwlinAZ May 2016 #57

Exactly! chwaliszewski May 2016 #79

What do you mean? SS jumped all over him, he saw them take people away. Joob May 2016 #61

These kids were just shouting "Animal Liberation now!" He could hear that. SunSeeker May 2016 #64

Exactly! OnyxCollie May 2016 #50

Bernie lied that these kids tried to intimidate him. nt SunSeeker May 2016 #66

Mind-reading skills, huh? OnyxCollie May 2016 #75

Fortunately, there's videotape that shows Sanders is lying. SunSeeker May 2016 #77

Again you claim to know what others are thinking, and how they perceive things. OnyxCollie May 2016 #80

Sanders was not describing his "feelings." nt SunSeeker May 2016 #81

What is intimidation then, other than how someone feels? OnyxCollie May 2016 #82

Did he say he was intimidated? No. SunSeeker May 2016 #83

Oh, what horseshit. OnyxCollie May 2016 #84

You just described a physical act, namely touching a coworker. SunSeeker May 2016 #85

Whew Iwillnevergiveup May 2016 #11

Thanks folks that think this is okay fine. Gave me some more names to add to my ignore list mikehiggins May 2016 #12

Speaking of Oakland Calif, my GoldenState Warriors just beat OKC c588415 May 2016 #14

Same Secret Service personnel as in Santa Maria, CA emsimon33 May 2016 #29

A Sanders campaign plot, someone said left-of-center2012 May 2016 #32

Creative Speculation is missing an OP. nt OnyxCollie May 2016 #76

Oh fuck a duck passiveporcupine May 2016 #43

A giant load of ... CountAllVotes May 2016 #51

OMG I am glad he is OK rbrnmw May 2016 #47

+1 bravenak May 2016 #54

Animal rights activist RandySF May 2016 #49

Are you sure you wouldn't rather hang out in the Hillary forum? chwaliszewski May 2016 #53

WTF are you ranting about? RandySF May 2016 #58

My Channel 7 watoos May 2016 #55

First of all, the title of this thread should be changed passiveporcupine May 2016 #63

Definition of attack also includes verbal and aggressive acts... Donkees May 2016 #71

Even under that definition, they were not attacking Sanders. SunSeeker May 2016 #73

Your posts here have shown you to have lost any credibility on this news. Please just give FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #86

No one has managed to dispute what I have said, despite triple and quadruple teaming me. SunSeeker May 2016 #87

You do have a valid point passiveporcupine May 2016 #74

This group has a history of disrupting Bernie events Donkees Jun 2016 #88