Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Midnight Writer

(25,107 posts)

3. Maybe, just maybe, she simply doesn't know how much a banker invested in her son-in-laws business

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:15 PM

May 2016

I think the "she refuses to answer" charge is a wee bit over the top. Perhaps she has her own priorities to attend to right now.

Maybe she is not privy to every financial transaction made by the guy who married her daughter.

Are we now holding her responsible for her son-in-law's business? Should she have stepped in and told her son-in-law that he is forbidden to accept a business investment from the largest business investor in the world?

This seems a little silly to me.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It’s Not Just the Speeches: Hillary Clinton Questioned over Son-in-Law’s Ties to Goldman Sachs [View all] Cheese Sandwich May 2016 OP

This should get her to 60% SmittynMo May 2016 #1

Right! JDPriestly May 2016 #4

Who's documenting this primary? Ned_Devine May 2016 #2

Maybe, just maybe, she simply doesn't know how much a banker invested in her son-in-laws business Midnight Writer May 2016 #3