Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

robbob

(3,524 posts)
81. Live in an alternative universe where the media would actually give equal time to the front runners?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jun 2016

I listen to NPR/VPR as I drive in an out of Montreal on my way to work, trying to keep in touch with what is happening down in the USA. For the last several months I have listened to segment after segment where a panel of talking heads would look at the week in campaign developments. Usually the segment would involve discussing the various GOP candidates still in the race, with the emphasis gradually shifting to Trump, Cruz and Rubio as the others dropped out.

Even as it became more and more apparent that Cruz and Rubio had NO chance of winning there was still intense focus on who was saying what, how the GOP would react to Trump winning, would Cruz and Rubio work together to overcome Trumps lead (THAT lasted about 24 hours, lol!), and other such "analysis" from the professional pollsters.

Then, with about 2 minutes left in the segment, the focus would shift to the Dems. "What will Hillary do about this"? "Here is what Hillary had to say about the latest Trump gaffe...", etc. etc. And very often the segment would end without even a MENTION of Bernie Sanders. This did not happen once. This did not happen twice. I heard this happening over and over again, literally dozens of times. And not just in the last few weeks, when Hillary looked pretty certain to win the nomination, and not just in the first couple of weeks, when Bernie was a relative unknown with little chance of winning delegates. This happened consistently throughout the primaries.

Now keep a couple things in mind: many of the GOP clown car inhabitants never had ANY chance of getting the nomination. And yet they all received their moment in the spotlight. Even towards the end, as it became more and more apparent that Rubio and Cruz were NOT winning delegates, still hours and hours of air time was spent relating their stories to the public.

Another thing to keep in mind: Bernie Sanders ran a HISTORIC campaign, funded entirely from small contributions by individual supporters. Also historic were the energized and exiting rallies he ran all across the country, speaking to tens of thousands of people at a time.

And yet, for some reason, none of this was newsworthy according to the "experts" at NPR, a supposedly "left wing" source of news in America (although we all know better). Now listen; I KNOW Bernie's campaign did receive some attention in the media, and not all of it unfavorable, but I am just saying that I literally lost count of the number of times I sat through a "week in politics" summary of the primary campaign trail, and literally did not even hear Bernie's name come up.

How do you fight against that kind of bias?

An assist, that's putting it mildly. chapdrum Jun 2016 #1
^ BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2016 #7
Brian Williams...gag me hibbing Jun 2016 #9
Williams: "Bernie Failed to Connect." McKim Jun 2016 #17
I Went To An Event With 20,000 People In Key Arena scottie55 Jun 2016 #39
I went to the polls with several million other voters, which is where it counts in the end Hekate Jun 2016 #70
The Dirty Trick in California was The Media "Calling it for Hillary"... bvar22 Jun 2016 #83
Yep. mmonk Jun 2016 #48
I wouldn't call raucous support a bad thing. Would you? Nitram Jun 2016 #65
I don't know. merrily Jun 2016 #77
Not the original, but this is what I feel like singing sometimes around here. Hoyt Jun 2016 #2
"I see. Well, in that case...." johnp3907 Jun 2016 #3
Bernie fought the good fight Politicub Jun 2016 #4
Thank you. mmonk Jun 2016 #49
I hope we hear more from Bernie Politicub Jun 2016 #54
Bernie lost because he did not get enough votes. iandhr Jun 2016 #5
That's very true. It's not that less people wanted him as president but somehow, as if by magic rhett o rick Jun 2016 #10
Can you think of anything that Sanders might have done better? Orrex Jun 2016 #18
Seen this? proverbialwisdom Jun 2016 #22
I'm not sure that that's actually a drop Orrex Jun 2016 #26
I'm not making any claims whatsoever beyond noting the oddness of the stats. (nt) proverbialwisdom Jun 2016 #28
Well, ok. Orrex Jun 2016 #32
Not at all, it's "big data" the Sanders campaign professionals should examine and understand. (nt) proverbialwisdom Jun 2016 #34
I read the tweet to mean... WaitWut Jun 2016 #36
You got it! FailureToCommunicate Jun 2016 #44
Ah. I see. Orrex Jun 2016 #46
Yes. Better organization. Understanding the rules of each state and what was required. Then again Laser102 Jun 2016 #63
anti-Trump sentiment Skittles Jun 2016 #29
I have an opinion Auggie Jun 2016 #33
I appreciate that answer. Thank you. Orrex Jun 2016 #45
Having more people step up on the national stage would help Auggie Jun 2016 #50
Senator Sanders liberal from boston Jun 2016 #69
You missed my point. I was referring to the national stage of presidential primary debates. Auggie Jun 2016 #73
as a communication expert NJCher Jun 2016 #74
I disagree. He needed more. Auggie Jun 2016 #79
As long as you're asking, Orrex... calimary Jun 2016 #75
Thanks for that perspective. Orrex Jun 2016 #76
Live in an alternative universe where the media would actually give equal time to the front runners? robbob Jun 2016 #81
NPR has done a lousy job this entire cycle, yes. Orrex Jun 2016 #82
Not getting enough votes is not magic. Nitram Jun 2016 #66
No magic at all. Less people DID want him as president. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #85
I'm thinking more like: kcdoug1 Jun 2016 #6
"Progressives" - making excuses since Henry Wallace in 1948 wyldwolf Jun 2016 #8
SO HARD....OH SO HARD!! Jack Bone Jun 2016 #25
Ah, look at that. MisterFred Jun 2016 #31
Help Of Corporate Media? JGug1 Jun 2016 #11
The media helped big time. The only thing major about the dem party is its level of desmiller Jun 2016 #12
what a shitty reply Skittles Jun 2016 #30
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #35
naughty list Skittles Jun 2016 #38
Are you? The way I see it, you're just picking a fight. atomingai Jun 2016 #51
none of you folk are fooling me Skittles Jun 2016 #59
You're obviously foolproof. Nitram Jun 2016 #67
I prefer "Island of Misfit Toys" Major Nikon Jun 2016 #72
Got a shittier one. chapdrum Jun 2016 #40
WHY DO YOU THINK I AM A HILLARY VOTER? Skittles Jun 2016 #60
You must have been watching on MARS ! penndragon69 Jun 2016 #14
google is our friend for sure stupidicus Jun 2016 #16
Sanders was everywhere, on TV, etc. Don't know where these people have been. Hoyt Jun 2016 #24
Clinton being the first woman to win a presidential nomination sulphurdunn Jun 2016 #15
Amen! afertal Jun 2016 #27
I also believe that your post and the previous post are gloating. Oldtimeralso Jun 2016 #19
Enjoy Watching The Coming Wars McKim Jun 2016 #20
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #13
I'm looking forward to their excuse-making throughout her presidency stupidicus Jun 2016 #21
Feel the Bern! StrictlyRockers Jun 2016 #23
Baloney! MarianJack Jun 2016 #37
Your reply, that is. chapdrum Jun 2016 #41
Oh, I can't wait for the 16th MarianJack Jun 2016 #58
Time, quite frankly, isn't on the Rolling Stones' side anymore. MADem Jun 2016 #42
"If the media is "in the tank" for anyone, chapdrum Jun 2016 #43
You will not last long here if you continue to toss insults like that. MADem Jun 2016 #47
Not intended as an insult. chapdrum Jun 2016 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author bobopa Jun 2016 #57
Thanks for all the replies both pro and con. mmonk Jun 2016 #52
The Stones were never the same after Bill Wyman left Ishoutandscream2 Jun 2016 #55
Ditto Taylor's departure. chapdrum Jun 2016 #56
Yes, excellent point Ishoutandscream2 Jun 2016 #61
Rec'd, but time is not on our side dreamnightwind Jun 2016 #62
Ah, the joys of victimhood and martyrdom. Nitram Jun 2016 #64
Time is on no one's side. davidthegnome Jun 2016 #68
Excellent post, David! Raster Jun 2016 #71
Bernie had some inherent flaws as a candidate that lexington filly Jun 2016 #78
I do agree: Right person *perhaps* at the wrong time of his life... Raster Jun 2016 #80
Interactive Map - Clinton or Sanders: Who did your L.A. neighborhood choose? proverbialwisdom Jun 2016 #84
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»You may have beaten us ba...»Reply #81