Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Pic Of The Moment: No Difference Between The Two Parties? [View all]Blanks
(4,835 posts)27. Jimmy Carter was president in 1980...
You're right. The graphic is (I believe) referring to the Reagan tax cuts which couldn't have occurred until Reagan became president in January of '81.
So, while we discuss 1980 as kind of the beginning of the Reagan administration in general terms because that's the year he won the election but his tax cuts didn't take effect until later.
Yes, the top income tax rate was 70% in 1980 and it was lowered to 28% under Reagan.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So your point is that loopholes created opportunities to avoid taxes. Still true today.
Scuba
Jun 2016
#28
A lot of things you could deduct in 1980 went away under the tax deal under reagan
7962
Jun 2016
#37
Pete Peterson. Was he one of the billionairs that received a tax free loan from raised proceeds
DhhD
Jun 2016
#53
Thank you. I was thinking there was something a little off with that overly sunny news story.
reformist2
Jun 2016
#45
Nobody would sensibly argue that there's NO difference whatsoever between the two parties. But
Gene Debs
Jun 2016
#3
So THAT's what all that repeal hoo-hah was really about. I think a lot of citizens were unaware.
ancianita
Jun 2016
#6
And the same party complains about too much government, too big, too much
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#51
On the other hand, both parties are in agreement on wars and fracking and messing with Social
djean111
Jun 2016
#9
Makes sense. Continuing Bush's wars isn't cheap, and they don't pay for themselves
arcane1
Jun 2016
#40