Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Pic Of The Moment: No Difference Between The Two Parties? [View all]Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So your point is that loopholes created opportunities to avoid taxes. Still true today.
Scuba
Jun 2016
#28
A lot of things you could deduct in 1980 went away under the tax deal under reagan
7962
Jun 2016
#37
Pete Peterson. Was he one of the billionairs that received a tax free loan from raised proceeds
DhhD
Jun 2016
#53
Thank you. I was thinking there was something a little off with that overly sunny news story.
reformist2
Jun 2016
#45
Nobody would sensibly argue that there's NO difference whatsoever between the two parties. But
Gene Debs
Jun 2016
#3
So THAT's what all that repeal hoo-hah was really about. I think a lot of citizens were unaware.
ancianita
Jun 2016
#6
And the same party complains about too much government, too big, too much
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#51
On the other hand, both parties are in agreement on wars and fracking and messing with Social
djean111
Jun 2016
#9
Makes sense. Continuing Bush's wars isn't cheap, and they don't pay for themselves
arcane1
Jun 2016
#40