Video & Multimedia

MADem

(135,425 posts)

86. Why are you asking me questions that have no basis in fact?

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 03:11 AM

Jun 2016

Are you goading and baiting? What is your purpose?

Pointing out facts is not "attacking." It is important that this distinction be made, because you, apparently, are having real trouble with it.

And the only thing I'm worried about is that the 20th doesn't come quickly enough--LOL!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

152 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bernie Sanders Sends Strong Message To Establishment [View all] Uncle Joe Jun 2016 OP

Democrats Send Strong Message to Bernie Sanders William769 Jun 2016 #1

I disagree, Schultz limiting and cynically manipulating the debates for when they would Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #3

+1000 billhicks76 Jun 2016 #6

+ bazillion. zonkers Jun 2016 #116

She won by 4 million votes, and it wasn't because there were only 9 debates pnwmom Jun 2016 #16

I have no doubt the limited number and cynically manipulated scheduling of the debates combined Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #18

Limited number? What a joke. There were plenty of opportunities pnwmom Jun 2016 #21

It wasn't half the number of debates held in 2008 when Hillary "loved" them and she did back out Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #23

By the time they got to the last debate in NY, there was no point. pnwmom Jun 2016 #34

another lie OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #109

2008 and 2016 Craig234 Jun 2016 #150

"Cynically manipulated scheduling of the debates ..." NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #28

Yeah, and everyone has one of those... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #71

Not everyone ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #81

Most voters weren't 'revolutionists' Craig234 Jun 2016 #151

That is a flat out lie and has been debunked time after time OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #108

Read it and weep. pnwmom Jun 2016 #115

+2000 Gene Debs Jun 2016 #36

+ a million! tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #72

I have to say MFM008 Jun 2016 #92

Sorry, you don't get to make up reality. You have your opinion and that is all! upaloopa Jun 2016 #100

Are people on AOL.com still ... Tortmaster Jun 2016 #103

+1000 n/t Triana Jun 2016 #105

It will never improve until we make it improve OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #106

Least likely? whatthehey Jun 2016 #129

That was the FIRST and highest rated debate which coincidentally came five days Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #130

Anybody who wanted to hear debates could whatthehey Jun 2016 #131

Television is still a most powerful propaganda force especially for older generations and this is Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #132

And over 65MM saw them that way. Averaged over 7MM each. Only 29MM voted whatthehey Jun 2016 #133

65 million is incorrect, many of those were the same people viewing multiple debates, Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #134

How many? More than 36MM? whatthehey Jun 2016 #136

With just 1 post U eliminate 1000's of votes Hillary needs to win Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #29

Thats what Democrats said to Bernie Sanders. William769 Jun 2016 #39

And what "message" is Hillary Clinton, exactly? Scootaloo Jun 2016 #47

Here TYT/The Young Turks Politics Reporter Jordan Chariton reported June 15 appalachiablue Jun 2016 #2

He should have been standing with his fellow senators and sending a strong message about MADem Jun 2016 #4

It's not like he has to run for President or anything. William769 Jun 2016 #5

Really. No more primaries--he can get back to work. nt MADem Jun 2016 #13

Lame BS Comment billhicks76 Jun 2016 #7

Perhaps you are unaware that Chuck Todd's WIFE worked for Sanders? MADem Jun 2016 #11

Don't Confuse His Wife With Him billhicks76 Jun 2016 #15

It's propaganda. I have a Twitter account but like many non-young people, pnwmom Jun 2016 #20

+1,000! If you want to "follow" someone, like a candidate, MADem Jun 2016 #32

Lol! MADem Jun 2016 #27

Your Favorite Journalists Do Same With Clinton billhicks76 Jun 2016 #152

What did the Senators pass in regards to this issue and why does it make a difference Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #8

He is a sitting Senator--his place is in the SENATE, not on "Meet The Press." nt MADem Jun 2016 #9

You didn't answer my questions and the first video on the link which I supplied wasn't Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #10

A Press Conference isn't "on the floor of the Senate" either. MADem Jun 2016 #12

Bernie got the message out, that's the main thing and if the Senate actually VOTES on this issue, Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #14

Mmmm hmmmm. MADem Jun 2016 #30

them, not you Craig234 Jun 2016 #41

Sanders wasn't there, so I don't know what you're talking about. MADem Jun 2016 #45

Why do you continue to attack Bernie? tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #83

Why are you asking me questions that have no basis in fact? MADem Jun 2016 #86

Your visceral hatred for Bernie is noted... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #93

Your powers of discernment are lacking. MADem Jun 2016 #99

Not a single one of your posts on this thread actually addresses the issues brought up in the video Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #117

You continually make it "all about me." Soon, that sort of thing will not be allowed here. MADem Jun 2016 #118

Thanks for reinforcing my point. n/t Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #119

The point that you repeatedly target me? It's obvious to anyone who reads our exchanges. MADem Jun 2016 #120

I'm not targeting you. You targeted this OP with a large number, if not the most posts on this Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #121

No, I discussed an aspect of the issue you raised. You don't get to control the responses to a MADem Jun 2016 #124

You don't have to "cheerlead" for the issues raised in an OP, there is nothing wrong with debating Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #125

My point was directly related to your thread title. MADem Jun 2016 #139

What I'm talking about Craig234 Jun 2016 #126

He is not a separate entity. He is one of a hundred and he didn't show up at work MADem Jun 2016 #140

Yes, it's an attack. Craig234 Jun 2016 #144

He needed to be at THAT one. And he was MIA. MADem Jun 2016 #148

Define "need" Craig234 Jun 2016 #149

In other words, you're exploiting 49 murdered men to justify your hatred of Sanders Scootaloo Jun 2016 #50

What an ugly, hate-filled comment. MADem Jun 2016 #53

Because it is about you. Or rather, what you're doing Scootaloo Jun 2016 #55

MADem refusing to ignore this horror and applauding Dems trying to help is NOT "exploitation." SunSeeker Jun 2016 #58

Some of us have been personally impacted by gun violence. MADem Jun 2016 #61

Except that's not what he's doing. Scootaloo Jun 2016 #63

No, that is what YOU are doing. MADem Jun 2016 #59

The Peewee herman defense doesn't work, MADem Scootaloo Jun 2016 #66

You are not deleting this ugliness. MADem Jun 2016 #70

Sorry but Scootaloo is spot on... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #87

I won't need to after the 20th. And you should worry about yourself. nt MADem Jun 2016 #89

Ah...the protective bubble of an echo chamber... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #94

The rules will not permit the bashing and trashing of Democratic candidates for public office. MADem Jun 2016 #96

Murdered men? lunamagica Jun 2016 #102

Sometimes, much is revealed unintentionally. MADem Jun 2016 #122

I know...that jumped at me lunamagica Jun 2016 #123

Where was Senator Boxer standing? azurnoir Jun 2016 #38

When you find out (since you're so interested) I am sure you'll let us know! nt MADem Jun 2016 #46

I'm not engaging in a double standard again where's Senator Boxer CA? where's Senator Leahy VT? azurnoir Jun 2016 #49

I thought Boxer and Feinstein were crafting an amendment to the MADem Jun 2016 #64

so where are Boxer and Leahy? I'm impressed Klobuchar did something though azurnoir Jun 2016 #65

You have google, too--the sea lion thing gets old. MADem Jun 2016 #74

I'm not the one singleing out Sanders for demonization I asked a question azurnoir Jun 2016 #76

How many of those other Senators ran for POTUS? MADem Jun 2016 #79

there are multiple threads asking/demonizing Sanders for not being on the Senate floor azurnoir Jun 2016 #82

I did not start those threads. MADem Jun 2016 #97

No but multiple threads are indeed demonizing ps I never said you started them azurnoir Jun 2016 #98

I don't think noting someone's conduct is demonizing. MADem Jun 2016 #141

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #17

Reasonable and rational. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #19

I agree and I do, PufPuf23. Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #24

The so-called most progressive Senator is MIA as Dems filibuster for gun control in the Senate. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #22

This is not old? Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #25

That is not him there today, when Senate Dems needed all the help they could get. NT SunSeeker Jun 2016 #26

Bernie's view of corporate greed is highly selective BainsBane Jun 2016 #33

D- Craig234 Jun 2016 #42

No--you don't get to make up "facts" like that. She has an F from the NRA. MADem Jun 2016 #51

I didn't make up any fact Craig234 Jun 2016 #127

YES--you DID. MADem Jun 2016 #138

uh, no Craig234 Jun 2016 #143

"Them" isn't "terribly clear" by any measure. nt MADem Jun 2016 #145

No, "them" isn't, by itself. Craig234 Jun 2016 #146

Didn't seem that way to me. nt MADem Jun 2016 #147

Bullshit BainsBane Jun 2016 #56

The only false thing made up is your attack Craig234 Jun 2016 #128

can you give us video of Barbara Boxer speaking? azurnoir Jun 2016 #37

Can you do anything but deflect? NT SunSeeker Jun 2016 #40

IOW no? azurnoir Jun 2016 #43

can you do anything but obsessively cherry pick Bernie and attack him and not be consistent? NT Craig234 Jun 2016 #44

How is noting Bernie is AWOL at this historic moment "cherry picking"? SunSeeker Jun 2016 #48

I find it astounding that people are annoyed that it was NOTICED that he didn't turn up. MADem Jun 2016 #57

We hold Obama's feet to the fire, not Bernie's. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #60

Indeed! nt MADem Jun 2016 #62

not quite we find a double standard that the only Democratic Senator being Demonized for not being azurnoir Jun 2016 #67

Well, when most of them did show up, and the ones that MADem Jun 2016 #68

Riiiight okay then I knew this demonizing of Sanders would somehow be justified azurnoir Jun 2016 #69

Since you didn't quite grasp it the first time, and memorialized it, MADem Jun 2016 #78

Boxer was posting on Facebook today while her constituents were asking why she wasn't on the floor azurnoir Jun 2016 #80

There is a link at post 75 that explains what she was doing. MADem Jun 2016 #84

with numerous other people agreeing with her @why isn't Boxer on the Senate floor azurnoir Jun 2016 #85

No. I clicked the link the 1st time. nt MADem Jun 2016 #88

well you did but others may not have seen it yet azurnoir Jun 2016 #91

Demonizing describes it just fine. It has been going on for the last 6 months or so. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #114

The establishment is busy standing up to the NRA BainsBane Jun 2016 #31

LOL-ain't that the truth! MADem Jun 2016 #35

Hate to tell ya but main concern was people on terror watch lists and no fly lists azurnoir Jun 2016 #90

As they should have been for years OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #110

I saw his strong tweet RandySF Jun 2016 #52

Someone should remind him that he didn't win the nomination demosincebirth Jun 2016 #54

Uncle Joe Iwillnevergiveup Jun 2016 #73

U.S. Senators Participate In Day-Long Gun Control Filibuster Following Orlando Mass Shooting tirebiter Jun 2016 #75

In other words, his colleagues were WORKING. RandySF Jun 2016 #77

It's abut time. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #111

OOOOH - COOL! NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #95

I'd say Hillary didn't debate Bernie in CA because she'd already won lexington filly Jun 2016 #101

She hasn't won yet OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #112

Leaving DU and It's Army of Paid Trolls and Party Operatives McKim Jun 2016 #104

Real Democrats will find a new way. This place is a swamp as is Daily Kos. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #113

GBCW posts usually are ineffective on a good day and subject the aggrieved writer to mocking, often MADem Jun 2016 #142

The voting irregularities, and slow counts were never a problem when all candidates NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #107

Americans don't want to endorse crimes felix_numinous Jun 2016 #135

This is why I really respect this man gopbasher452 Jun 2016 #137