Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
4. You mean 1995, or 2003 right? (Something inside the span of the ban?)
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 11:23 AM
Jul 2012

That's also incorrect. He COULD have acquired every single weapon and magazine he possessed the night of the shooting. It would have been a different model AR-15, because Smith and Wesson wasn't making those back then, but there were flat-top AR-15's for sale in 1995, new in box from other manufacturers. The features it would have been missing to comply with the law wouldn't have factored into this slaughter at all.

The beta-c mag would have been very expensive, as much as the rifle itself, but that would have been the only 'rare' component in the pile of shit he had on him that night. (And like most beta-c mags, the stupid thing jammed on him)

The 1994 AWB had no impact on this issue, unless, and I haven't heard this reported, but unless he fixed a bayonet to the end of his rifle, and stabbed someone with it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Thom Hartmann: How many m...»Reply #4