Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Axelrod Rips Clinton for Excuses: 'It Takes a Lot of Work to Lose to Donald Trump.' [View all]BeyondGeography
(40,968 posts)32. She lost the campaign where it happened
Battlegrounds i.e. FL, NC, PA, OH, MI, WI...she won fewer electoral votes than any Dem since Dukakis. She campaigned in PA 12 times and still lost. She lost states that had been blue since the 1980s. She blew off MI and WI. She got a quarter million less votes in WI than Obama and 50k less votes in Detroit.
Axelrod didn't rip her; that's the video clip headline. He's just reminding people there was a lot more to this result than Comey and Russia. He's clearly right.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Axelrod Rips Clinton for Excuses: 'It Takes a Lot of Work to Lose to Donald Trump.' [View all]
BeyondGeography
May 2017
OP
Hillary & her fellow high-level campaign associates. Please repudiate this if you can. If you can't
NBachers
May 2017
#33
And yet, she lost Michigan, a state that should have been safe for her. As someone who
OnDoutside
May 2017
#36
MI would have been fine if everyone voted and their votes counted -- VOTER SUPPRESSION AT WORK.
ATL Ebony
May 2017
#42
Maybe he's thinking bigger picture and wants Democrats to reflect on more than victimhood
BeyondGeography
May 2017
#9
No. That's not his point. He's wrong at misstating what HRC said. He's got an issue. nt
Honeycombe8
May 2017
#20
The man knows a thing or two about running presidential campaigns . . . successful oines even n/t
markpkessinger
May 2017
#22
That's irrelevant. He's interpreting what someone said, and he's wrong in his interpretation.
Honeycombe8
May 2017
#30
Assuming all things being equal (vs suppressing voters, erasing votes, etc.) she
ATL Ebony
May 2017
#43
CNN had Trump Supporters whoring for him all day and then they had Axelrod and VAn Jones
JI7
May 2017
#19
Here's a list of Clinton or high-level campaign associates' visits to PA, MI, and WI:
NBachers
May 2017
#34