Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

still_one

(98,883 posts)

2. That is according to WH "senior administration officials" There is no credibility with what this WH

Reply to turbinetree (Original post)

Thu May 11, 2017, 10:44 AM

May 2017

says. I wouldn't trust anything that this administration says, and especially the story that McCabe told Priebus that "the NYT story was BS".

In the letter where trump fires Comey, trump says he was told 3 times by Comey, that Comey told him he was not being investigated for any Russian interactions", and that simply is not true.

I am not saying McCabe, or the FBI can trusted, but I sure know anything that comes out from the trump administration cannot be trusted, and the source for this story is trump's senior administration officials. At least that is how I see it

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New FBI Director Andrew McCabe Compromised By Serious Conflict Rachel Maddow MSNBC [View all] turbinetree May 2017 OP

I wondered whatever yesphan May 2017 #1

That is according to WH "senior administration officials" There is no credibility with what this WH still_one May 2017 #2

I love Rachel but we have to be more scrupulous against WH propaganda chowder66 May 2017 #3

So what is the "serious conflict" in the headline? MGKrebs May 2017 #4

If it is true that McCabe told the WH that the NYT's story was bs Maeve May 2017 #5