Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Thomas Frank: Why Clinton attacks Sanders in new Book [View all]Susan Calvin
(1,650 posts)135. Don't agree.
Think the distinction is on the perceived worth of the news source.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
152 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Precisely, one only needs to know who the person is to know the way the video is going to go.
George II
Sep 2017
#13
Why would I even consider refuting what someone I'm not interested in has to say?
George II
Sep 2017
#72
He says "Dems have occupied the WH 16 of the last 24 years" instead of repugs have...
brush
Sep 2017
#92
It's far easier snipe at and use a "corrupt" established party than to do the work of building
ehrnst
Sep 2017
#66
Yep, they don't want to do that work. They prefer a hostile takeover instead of having...
brush
Sep 2017
#94
Getting 3 minutes and 58 seconds into it would have certainly confirmed your belief.
Amimnoch
Sep 2017
#28
In both 2008 and 2016 Hillary Clinton was treated as Bill Clinton's wife running for president.
StevieM
Sep 2017
#50
Bernie is Everyman-progressive; Hillary is political-elite-neoliberal. That's why.
Magoo48
Sep 2017
#14
Seems to be he has a big problem w Bill Clinton, beyond that Hillary's not gracious enough.
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#85
Then why did he cherry pick this: He says, "Dems have occupied the WH 16 of the last 24 yrs" instea
brush
Sep 2017
#95
It was great for men- the white ones. Only by extension to their wives and kids though.
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#35
It was built on women and POC being exploited for grossly underpaid and or free labor....
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#53
You realize Obama was punished in the midterms for pushing through heathcare- higher taxes
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#63
It seems like the Scandanvian model of social democracy is being challenged by diversity...
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#75
Yeah, there's no sexism, racism, xenophobia there. All that affordable health care and wage equity
ehrnst
Sep 2017
#89
You don't seem to understand that women and POC were left behind by the new deal- it widened the
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#65
It was good for 1930s America. We have no idea of how it would be for 2010s America.
George II
Sep 2017
#116
The so called progressives who wanted to get rid of pelosi got behind that type of democrat
JI7
Sep 2017
#144
Oh, please: claims that anyone who doesn't love the former Speaker or nominee is sexist is pathetic
Chasstev365
Sep 2017
#145
You are absolutely correct that many voted against Hillary because she is a woman
Chasstev365
Sep 2017
#147
"You can't blame her for her husbands deeds BUT...." and she's not gracious enough, LOL.
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#47
100%. It is an excellent history & outline of the current challenges/factions dividing our Party.
stuffmatters
Sep 2017
#83
Interesting he wouldn't notice his own gratuitous comments on her congeniality...
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#113
the past 18 months have been an eye opener. So many people completely unaware of their sexist crap.
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#138
Wrong, the Clinton philosophy was NOT breaking the Democrats away from the New Deal
Eliot Rosewater
Sep 2017
#78
Yep. All the Republicans would have to say to defeat a Bernie/Frank agenda is say this
Yavin4
Sep 2017
#96
We need to not be intimidated by ignorance and hatred and stay and defend New Deal democracy
LiberalLovinLug
Sep 2017
#136