Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Velveteen Ocelot

(129,933 posts)
5. Exactly right.
Wed Sep 27, 2017, 04:37 PM
Sep 2017

That used to be my job. We'd train pilots to handle all kinds of emergencies and system failures that would have been unsafe even to demonstrate in an airplane. Some of these situations can be simulated quite effectively even in level B and C simulators, which have lower standards of motion and visual displays, but you can throw them something like an electrical or hydraulic system failure or a flight instrument failure, make them run the checklist and handle whatever configuration changes are necessary. The type ride is always in a level D simulator and it will be scenario-based, but will cover certain kinds of emergencies or malfunctions as approved by the FAA. Yes, the training in a simulator is far superior to anything that could be safely done in the real airplane. You're not going to be failing an engine on takeoff, or "simulating" a dual engine failure, or shutting down a flight management computer in a real airplane without causing a very dangerous situation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Is Your Life Worth More T...»Reply #5