Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Nina Turner on BERNIE SANDERS at the Women's Convention [View all]Ninsianna
(1,356 posts)tripling down. Interesting.
You agree that what you said and tripled down on is wrong? Most blacks and most Americans did not elect Nina Turner to speak for them, since you've made this claim three times I'm still waiting to see how you prove that anyone said Nina gets to speak for people's opinions on Bernie Sanders.
Your comment says exactly what I said, please don't insult me further by pretending that it was not exactly what you typed and what I stated it was. That's dishonest and on the heels of some deeply offensive, racist and misogynistic statements, it's just making your stance worse.
Still waiting to see where I offered such a poll, but you've made claims, and still haven't backed it up, so stop waiting, figuring out more offensive things to say and more ad hominems and get cracking backing up what you said about how Nina is our savior and is anointed to speak for all of us. This is the crux of your claim, if you can't back it up, you've just said a lot of deeply offensive things and are rather deep in a ditch you've dug for yourself.
So that's an article from the Hill about this study, but I asked you for raw data, and you failed to provide it. Can you back that up?
Raw data is important so that we can see who the population is, what questions they were asked, and if they were asked to pick people out of a group of a selected number of people, who the choices were etc. If you say, give people limited choices of what's "favorable" for instance, or limited choices of politicians like in this study, your results don't make your point.
Looking forward to actual data.