Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LunaSea

(2,934 posts)
8. Probably not.
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 06:42 PM
Oct 2017

But now researchers say they've sussed out the whole situation for us. Theoretical physicists Zohar Ringel and Dmitry Korvizhini, who are based at Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University in Israel and Oxford University in the United Kingdom, claim to prove the concreteness of our reality in a recent Scientific Advances study.
To understand what they found, it helps to first recognize what a computer is: it's essentially a machine that performs calculations. In order for a computer to simulate reality, then, the machine would need to have enough power to actually create the phenomena that we experience within its simulated environment. What the researchers discovered, however, is that storing the information required to simulate certain behaviors of even a couple hundred electrons would take more atoms than exist in the universe. For better or for worse, this world is real. Probably.

https://www.popsci.com/quantum-hall-computer-simulation

"Physicists have pointed out that quantum physics makes this incredibly unlikely, given electrons and atoms aren't tiny balls whizzing predictably through space."

https://www.sciencealert.com/quantum-complexity-rules-out-our-universe-as-a-computer-simulation

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I love pseudo-scientists who put an exact figure to the odds on something they have absolutely Nitram Oct 2017 #1
I think that the odds are 50/50 that you are right about Elon Musk..... virtualobserver Oct 2017 #3
More like gazillion-to-one odds... Elon is a genius, but, WAYYY off base here. InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #5
Elon Musk is far from the only person who believes in the Holographic Universe. sagesnow Oct 2017 #16
Whether or not you "believe" in it, there is no basis upon which to establish the odds Nitram Oct 2017 #21
Belief that we are experiencing a simulated reality is the same as believing that God created Nitram Oct 2017 #22
Infinity Me. Oct 2017 #2
Okay, Russians. Get out of my mind! Gees, this is so out there. I'm getting off line now. The Wielding Truth Oct 2017 #4
And people are counting on this guy to get them to Mars??? Loyd Oct 2017 #6
This is all just a simulation? PJMcK Oct 2017 #7
You ( and your friends) may have chose to enter this mutuall sagesnow Oct 2017 #14
You dreamed up this version. sagesnow Oct 2017 #17
Shitty movie, actually PJMcK Oct 2017 #18
IMHO, Inception was a complex and interesting movie. sagesnow Oct 2017 #19
Probably not. LunaSea Oct 2017 #8
smart people often believe dumb things paulkienitz Oct 2017 #9
I had a PhD of Philosophy instructor... yallerdawg Oct 2017 #10
there's a lot we can't disprove paulkienitz Oct 2017 #12
Yep. Thinking about things is highly overrated. yallerdawg Oct 2017 #15
"It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between WinkyDink Oct 2017 #11
I'll have to show this to my girlfriend sometime. sandensea Oct 2017 #13
Ummm, no. paleotn Oct 2017 #20
And the kid who's playing this version of the Sims is a real dick. tclambert Oct 2017 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Elon Musk thinks we are m...»Reply #8