Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
37. Interesting
Sun Mar 18, 2018, 06:02 PM
Mar 2018

thanks for sharing that.

I'm sure the vast majority of public sector scientists have a great deal of integrity. But human nature being what it is, it is hard for anyone to say no to millions of dollars of corporate 'grant' money. You have to ask what is the motive for a company like Monsanto or duPont to give away such large sums of money in the first place? Corporations are not charities. I don't think they would be doing it if they weren't certain it would be to their benefit.

And those NDA agreements they want you to sign? Signing one of those things may make one akin to Stormy Daniels whoring herself to Trump imo. So much for transparency and integrity.

What I don't get is why the GMO industry, or anyone, would be opposed to NEUTRAL labeling? What are they hiding?

By neutral labeling I mean labeling that simply identifies something as a GMO made food product, not a warning label like cigarettes have. Not one that is large and prominent like the warning labels on cigarette packs, but in small discreet lettering on the back of the package similar to the ingredients list on every food product. Neutral labeling in the EU for example doesn't state whether GMO is good or bad, but simply that it is present. Every food company in the US is required to list the ingredients in their products. Why should GMO products be treated any differently?

Let everyone consumer decide for themself. Judging by this thread there are plenty of GMO supporters to keep the industry in business so they won't be going out of business, with or without the labeling. They will still have millions of supporters and customers who believe in the benefits of GMO, and that is fine.

In a free democratic society every person should have the power to decide for themself, not have their choices taken away and dictated to them by the corporate oligarchy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bookmarked for viewing later errant boy Mar 2018 #1
K&R&Bookmarking for later. Control-Z Mar 2018 #2
Yep, I definitely want to watch this later. Equinox Moon Mar 2018 #3
Can GMOs be patented? Alternative Facts Mar 2018 #4
Even in non-GMO Ag, seeds are not kept to plant next year. longship Mar 2018 #5
Monsantos Dirty Little Secret Alternative Facts Mar 2018 #9
It always seems to be about Monsanto. Why??? longship Mar 2018 #11
An interesting article that discusses the movie Food Evolution. airplaneman Mar 2018 #6
Um, no shenmue Mar 2018 #7
MONSANTO! Drink! Archae Mar 2018 #8
A couple of things that I have read that usually get breezed over... rwsanders Mar 2018 #10
Well, here. longship Mar 2018 #13
If they are safe then why do so many countries ban them? torius Mar 2018 #12
Because they listen to people who are not scientifically literate. longship Mar 2018 #14
They ban it because of common sense gyroscope Mar 2018 #15
That's not really the same thing. cab67 Mar 2018 #16
The EU doesn't ban GMO, but does mandate labeling gyroscope Mar 2018 #17
Problem with labeling - cab67 Mar 2018 #18
That's your opinion. gyroscope Mar 2018 #20
Not opinion. It's science! longship Mar 2018 #22
Sure, if you believe the industry funded "studies" gyroscope Mar 2018 #23
grummmmmmmble...... cab67 Mar 2018 #27
Ah! The Monsanto ploy again. longship Mar 2018 #28
So the WHO are lying? And there's no corporate money flowing into our universities? gyroscope Mar 2018 #30
Okay. longship Mar 2018 #31
I disagree with one of your claims cab67 Mar 2018 #26
Over 60% of your genes are shared with the Cavendish banana. longship Mar 2018 #29
that's not what transgenic means. cab67 Mar 2018 #33
But I don't think one can argue that they're qualitatively different. longship Mar 2018 #35
no. cab67 Mar 2018 #24
The difference is gyroscope Mar 2018 #32
I'm actually part of the higher education system - professor at a large research university. cab67 Mar 2018 #34
Interesting gyroscope Mar 2018 #37
A better idea cab67 Mar 2018 #38
That could work too gyroscope Mar 2018 #39
some sincere advice - cab67 Mar 2018 #40
To clarify gyroscope Mar 2018 #41
Also - cab67 Mar 2018 #19
Did I say they were? gyroscope Mar 2018 #21
you keep coming back to the issue of Monsanto's trustworthiness. cab67 Mar 2018 #25
dupe gyroscope Mar 2018 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Neil deGrasse Tyson gets ...»Reply #37