Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders on Van Jones Show 4/21/18 [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)32. It's true. My statements are not fallacious.
And criticism of Sanders does not equal "hatred."
My gramatical construction avoided a split infinitive - the "can be" is part of the second part of the statement.
Is that clearer?
You are applying my statements to Sanders, and had an emotional response.
An emotional response to any critique of Sanders is more indicative of an emotional, rather than logical assesment of the person doing the critiquing - which is rooted in confirmation bias.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps if you re-read *your* post I was replying to, you would understand why I posted what I did.
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#24
Altering one's viewpoint can also be an indication of listening and accepting new data.
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#14