Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(56,201 posts)
7. No, it doesn't.
Sun Jun 3, 2018, 01:25 PM
Jun 2018

Pardons can be used to free innocent people wrongly convicted, for example. Obviously there's no admission of guilt there, that would make no sense.

The notion that accepting a pardon implies admission of guilt comes from dicta in a specific case involving the government trying to give someone a pardon against their will in order to get around 5th amendment protections and to compel self-testimony.

I don't think any Supreme Court would hold that all pardons imply an admission of guilt.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Preet Bharara: The presid...»Reply #7