Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
8. Seems the admission of guilt part is not as clear-cut as I thought. You could be correct.
Sun Jun 3, 2018, 01:40 PM
Jun 2018

I did some more research based on your post. Opinion is quite divided on the subject.

In this specific case, I'd just make the argument that given pattern of behavior, public and private statements that have come to light it would be hard to conclude the pardon is anything other than an admission of guilt. A way to prevent actual prosecution.

My argument that it would not be just necessary, but compulsory, for congress to impeach and convict still stands.

On edit: I must admit I never understood why people who were pardoned for being innocent would have to admit guilt. As you say, that makes no sense. It seems that some opinions are that the pardon is worded in a way to convey the innocence and in other cases it is not.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Preet Bharara: The presid...»Reply #8