Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
8. Kinda hard to destroy evidence these days.
Sat Nov 17, 2018, 01:35 AM
Nov 2018

I worked in litigation as a paralegal for years and handled the evidence. Everything is digitalized, if it's not already, multiple digital copies are made and housed in databases, which are backed up. They are indexed & summarized....also digitalized. And many of the documents (and testimony) are ultimately printed out. All the team members have copies of evidence pertaining to what they are working on.

Whitaker would see summaries of the evidence. Even if he got access to the database and destroyed it or a single piece of evidence, there is a backup. No one piece can go missing without it being noticed. Every document, every email, every photo, every witness statement is summarized and listed and distributed to the team members. Each piece of evidence is assigned a number. If one is removed intentionally, the numbered space indicates that it's intentionally blank.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»'Dour' White House staff ...»Reply #8