Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

judesedit

(4,590 posts)
45. You may be right. But, who knows the damage Palin would've been responsible for if she got in
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 10:55 AM
Jan 2021

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R! SheltieLover Jan 2021 #1
What is she planning? DownriverDem Jan 2021 #19
Can't watch it. SergeStorms Jan 2021 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2021 #6
How DownriverDem Jan 2021 #21
Yes, she can be expelled. lastlib Jan 2021 #28
Realistically, though - how close to two-thirds could they get? TheRickles Jan 2021 #31
Unfortunately, not close enough. lastlib Jan 2021 #35
+1 No exceptions. Bypass the detector, get thrown to the floor and taken away. lagomorph777 Jan 2021 #38
Install a camera too C_U_L8R Jan 2021 #3
Says she is a law abiding citizen... HuskyOffset Jan 2021 #4
This post right here. Sums it up nicely. n/t Beartracks Jan 2021 #9
The analysis by the commentators is really insightful Layzeebeaver Jan 2021 #5
She also needs to be investigated about those tweets she sent during the Capitol siege about Escurumbele Jan 2021 #7
Yeah. I don't know why... skypilot Jan 2021 #43
She's a Sarah Palin wannabe judesedit Jan 2021 #8
Worse IMO onetexan Jan 2021 #14
You may be right. But, who knows the damage Palin would've been responsible for if she got in judesedit Jan 2021 #45
But even dumber . . . hatrack Jan 2021 #30
If it wasn't so serious it would be funny. She is pretty stupid running her mouth judesedit Jan 2021 #46
Should deny her a chance to vote against impeachment. Raven123 Jan 2021 #10
Will now be banned?? I thought she was let through. lamp_shade Jan 2021 #11
These are a bunch of fucking children who don't like "rules". Time out required. bullimiami Jan 2021 #12
She's publicly admitted she'll be carrying in DC, where it's against the law. thucythucy Jan 2021 #13
What was the previous conviction for? 3Hotdogs Jan 2021 #27
Disorderly conduct, operating an unsafe vehicle. thucythucy Jan 2021 #29
I see DC has permits. Is she permitted? Are her guns registered? bullimiami Jan 2021 #32
I don't know. thucythucy Jan 2021 #42
folks have a right to eat to, does that mean you can take Beachnutt Jan 2021 #15
I worked short time in Rifle where she is from. Believe me it is dominated by drunken ignoramuses. olegramps Jan 2021 #16
If you don't stop her, soon the whole GOP caucus will be carrying bucolic_frolic Jan 2021 #17
I heard their debate about Pence invoking the 25th. wnylib Jan 2021 #18
. . . but I need muh gun! Aussie105 Jan 2021 #20
At the end Rorey Jan 2021 #22
Coached by the Koch wing of the GOP Tiger8 Jan 2021 #48
Bombs are not allowed. Her bag needs to be inspected for bombs, like ALL bags. But white privilege Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2021 #23
Yep. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Jan 2021 #34
She has school aged children, I think they need to be removed from the home TNNurse Jan 2021 #24
And then there is her husband, who, in 2004 (if I remember correctly) exposed himself to a minor niyad Jan 2021 #36
Really bad time Cetacea Jan 2021 #25
Did she get in to vote? TNNurse Jan 2021 #26
That "rules" question OldBaldy1701E Jan 2021 #37
Should be Rebl2 Jan 2021 #33
What a crazy bitch. Nt raccoon Jan 2021 #39
uhhh...she's not exactly a law-abiding citizen if she's carrying a gun in D.C. nt Trueblue Texan Jan 2021 #40
She does not understand that someone could over power her randr Jan 2021 #41
Her big claim to fame is she ran a diner in Colorado that encouraged open carry Ohioboy Jan 2021 #44
Did anyone in her district finish high school? dalton99a Jan 2021 #47
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»This dangerous dimwit con...»Reply #45