Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Terraforming Mars [View all]I agree with the complexities and improbabilities of the terraforming scenario.
I also think that we need to try to determine a way to preserve life on this planet and curtail our greedy and stupid impulses.
But I disagree with the idea that we would be 'destroying another planet.' I disagree with that both in tone and in terms of data indicating there is no life on Mars. There is nothing there to destroy. I think terraforming mars would be a terrific idea that would take an absurd number of generations but I think human beings moving out into the stars would be a good thing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
+1. But it's a nice diversion while all Earth's resources are stolen, though.
freshwest
Oct 2012
#26
Cool video, but until we "terraform" our strip mines, I don't think we should fuck up another planet
HopeHoops
Oct 2012
#20
Dead, or dormant? Earth had long "dead" periods. Our propulsion methods are deficient.
HopeHoops
Oct 2012
#34
Well, the "no magnetic field" thing is significant, but Curiosity has pretty much proven water.
HopeHoops
Oct 2012
#36
More to the point, what kinds of life has Mars sent here? And not just mars, asteroids.
HopeHoops
Oct 2012
#42