Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

jaxexpat

(7,794 posts)

5. I've seen that concept explored elsewhere.

Reply to Ligyron (Reply #2)

Tue Feb 9, 2021, 11:15 AM

Feb 2021

My take is that since it's so plainly logical no one would believe Trump could have anything to do with it. It's not like Trump to "plan" stuff.
Those channels are probably already worn out from overuse anyway. Let's look in and see.......
Russian spies in their proletarian hideout, "Natasha, it's Trump again. You wanna take his call this time?" "Good griefskis, will that troll never stop? No Boris, you take it. I can't stand to talk with heem again." "You don't wanna hear about his crowds or his stolen election problems again, my darlink?" "Not today, Boris, I have a splitting headache. Must be the AmWay wine he tried to bribe us with."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden BANNING Trump from Intelligence Briefings [View all] rsacamano Feb 2021 OP

It has been reported that he didn't read the briefings, but notinkansas Feb 2021 #1

They should have continued to give him his "Intelligence Briefings". Ligyron Feb 2021 #2

That's what I would have done. OAITW r.2.0 Feb 2021 #3

I would be disappointed if our intelligence community Mr.Bill Feb 2021 #7

OOooh, that would be so MEAN! lagomorph777 Feb 2021 #4

I've seen that concept explored elsewhere. jaxexpat Feb 2021 #5

I thought Biden answered O'Donnell's question perfectly. Old Crow Feb 2021 #6