Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Warpy

(114,529 posts)

2. Almost as sorry as the sacks at magazines

Reply to orpupilofnature57 (Reply #1)

Sat Jan 14, 2012, 09:38 PM

Jan 2012

who have been Photoshopping starveling models into impossibly thin shapes.

Honestly, if some of those cover girls looked like that, they'd be in hospital hooked up to tubes. The Photoshopped figures are incompatible with life.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A commentary on the media and standards of beauty: Adobe Photoshop Makeup Parody [View all] LuckyTheDog Jan 2012 OP

Can you imagine the sorry sacks orpupilofnature57 Jan 2012 #1

Almost as sorry as the sacks at magazines Warpy Jan 2012 #2

Thats why I love what Jamie lee Curtis did . orpupilofnature57 Jan 2012 #3

+1 BrendaBrick Jan 2012 #4

Holy shit. I'm glad it said it was a parody!!! It's still true. HopeHoops Jan 2012 #5