Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Claustrum

(5,058 posts)
3. Is this correct though?
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 05:36 PM
Oct 2021

I mean, lets say the republican go after Obama or Clinton for something they did in their terms. Then Obama or Clinton can't claim executive privilege for any conversations they made during his term? That just doesn't seem right to me because those conversations happened during Trump/Obama/Clinton's term, even though the probe is after they become ex-president.


I am not saying Trump isn't overreaching and waving the "executive privilege" like a magic wand. He certainly did it wrong when he asserted that privilege with Don Jr (which Don Jr wasn't employed by the executive branch, thus no privilege). I am simply saying that it makes sense in some instance for an ex-president to use "executive privilege" for conversations or things they did during their term.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Trump Plans To Avoid Subp...»Reply #3