Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bucolic_frolic

(55,435 posts)
14. Invoking executive privilege to protect crimes against the State would be a bridge too far
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 07:06 PM
Oct 2021

I could see it invoked to protect revelations that would harm the public, like a military operation gone wrong, or in foreign policy deliberations about or with other countries, or about domestic policies about which parties disagree. But about advice or strategy for seditious acts to overturn the very foundation of elected representative government? No. That is using the public tool of executive privilege, which is designed to protect the State and the country from harm and turmoil, for the private interest of one of the parties or its former head. It's a get-out-of-jail free card to protect an attempt to invalidate the collective will of the American People as expressed by their head count in a free and fair election - a democracy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Trump Plans To Avoid Subp...»Reply #14