Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Rhiannon12866

(258,595 posts)

7. Well said.

Reply to Aussie105 (Reply #6)

Tue Apr 12, 2022, 09:52 PM

Apr 2022

And I couldn't agree more with you about the only two groups who should be allowed guns. They are the only groups who would have a reason to "need" a gun, law enforcement and fighting a war. And, even then, there are abuses. Those who do not "need," nor should ever have a gun, are those with no training, those who believe it's acceptable to carry a lethal weapon around in public - and especially those with "grievances."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Law Enforcement Expert: Brooklyn Subway Shooter 'Probably Had Some Kind Of Grievance' - The ReidOut [View all] Rhiannon12866 Apr 2022 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2022 #1

At this point, I think half the country could use therapy after the trauma we suffered for 4+ years Rhiannon12866 Apr 2022 #2

Don't think any of that applies to this shooter. But who know? Hoyt Apr 2022 #5

Right. Because having a grievance is an excellent PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2022 #3

So tired of all the grievies BeyondGeography Apr 2022 #4

At a guess, he didn't like crowded spaces. Aussie105 Apr 2022 #6

Well said. Rhiannon12866 Apr 2022 #7

I really hate this kind of speculative BS . . . markpkessinger Apr 2022 #8