Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,862 posts)
17. Not here in California. There's no phone service required if you can find a local provider.
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 01:43 PM
Aug 2018

AT&T maintains the copper wire pair to my house for some fraction of my internet service fees, but they are not my internet service provider.

When I first got internet service in this house (beyond pokey dialup that never approached 56kbit/s) neither Comcast nor Pacific Bell offered consumer level internet service. At best Pacific Bell call center people would bounce you up to their business services offering expensive fractional trunk or ISDN lines, but mostly they hadn't a clue. Internet? What's that? Huh?

I'm probably just lucky to live in an area where higher speed Internet Services were established before the phone and cable companies could monopolize them.

My wife's parents live in a rural place where AT&T wireless or satellite is the only option. They have AT&T wireless. A single Microsoft Windows update can blow out their data limits for the month, and even if they did pay for higher data limits, it's still unlikely Netflix would work.

My parents live in another place, like ours, that enjoys independent internet services, even though it's fairly rural.

We could have inexpensive high speed internet service for everyone in the U.S.A. if we wanted it.

Too bad the telcoms own our politicians.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Guess I'll cut cable TV -...»Reply #17